Gaber CE et al (2022) Epidemiologic and economic burden of achalasia in the United States. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 20(2):342–352

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rosemurgy A et al (2017) Dissatisfaction after laparoscopic Heller myotomy: the truth is easy to swallow. Am J Surg 213(6):1091–1097

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Taft TH, Carlson DA, Triggs J et al (2018) Evaluating the reliability and construct validity of the Eckardt symptom score as a measure of achalasia severity. Neurogastroenterol Motil 30(6):e13287. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.13287

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Inoue H et al (2010) Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy 42(04):265–271

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Awaiz A et al (2017) Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) and laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) for achalasia. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 27(3):123–131

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Facciorusso A et al (2021) Comparative efficacy of first-line therapeutic interventions for achalasia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 35:4305–4314

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schlottmann F et al (2018) Laparoscopic Heller myotomy versus peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 267(3):451–460

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang J, Tan N, Xiao Y et al (2015) Safety and efficacy of the modified peroral endoscopic myotomy with shorter myotomy for achalasia patients: a prospective study. Dis Esophagus 28(8):720–727. https://doi.org/10.1111/dote.12280

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Werner YB et al (2019) Endoscopic or surgical myotomy in patients with idiopathic achalasia. N Engl J Med 381(23):2219–2229

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vaezi MF, Pandolfino JE, Yadlapati RH, Greer KB, Kavitt RT (2020) ACG clinical guidelines: diagnosis and management of achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol 115(9):1393–1411. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000000731

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Abbas AE (2022) Commentary: Peroral endoscopic myotomy, the poetic remedy for type III achalasia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 163(2):522–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.03.038

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ghazaleh S, Beran A, Khader Y et al (2021) Short versus standard peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Gastroenterol 34(5):634–642. https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2021.0644

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Nabi Z, Talukdar R, Mandavdhare H, Reddy DN (2022) Short versus long esophageal myotomy during peroral endoscopic myotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative trials. Saudi J Gastroenterol 28(4):261–267. https://doi.org/10.4103/sjg.sjg_438_21

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chandan S, Facciorusso A, Khan SR et al (2021) Short versus standard esophageal myotomy in achalasia patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Endosc Int Open 9(8):E1246–E1254. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1490-8493

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Weng CY, He CH, Zhuang MY, Xu JL, Lyu B (2022) Peroral endoscopic longer vs shorter esophageal myotomy for achalasia treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Surg 14(3):247–259. https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v14.i3.247

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339:b2535. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I (2005) Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 5:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-5-13

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315(7109):629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

DerSimonian R, Kacker R (2007) Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update. Contemp Clin Trials 28(2):105–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2006.04.004

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Familiari P, de Andreis FB, Landi R et al (2023) Long versus short peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: results of a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial. Gut 72(8):1442–1450. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2021-325579

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gu L, Ouyang Z, Lv L, Liang C, Zhu H, Liu D (2021) Safety and efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy with standard myotomy versus short myotomy for treatment-naïve patients with type II achalasia: a prospective randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 93(6):1304–1312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.10.006

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nabi Z, Ramchandani M, Sayyed M et al (2021) Comparison of short versus long esophageal myotomy in cases with idiopathic achalasia: a randomized controlled trial. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 27(1):63–70. https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm20022

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rai P, Kumar P, Goel A et al (2024) Peroral endoscopic myotomy: short versus long esophageal myotomy for achalasia cardia: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 34(5):445–451. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001303

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gao Q, Tu S, Tang X, Huang S, Gong W (2017) Mid-term outcomes of a single center randomized controlled trial comparing peroral endoscopic short versus long myotomy for achalasia in China. Am J Gastroenterol 112:S173–S174

Google Scholar 

Puli SR, Wagh MS, Forcione D, Gopakumar H (2023) Learning curve for esophageal peroral endoscopic myotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 55(4):355–360. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1935-1093

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Khashab MA, El Zein M, Kumbhari V et al (2016) Comprehensive analysis of efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy performed by a gastroenterologist in the endoscopy unit: a single-center experience. Gastrointest Endosc 83(1):117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2015.06.013

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Heimgartner B, Herzig M, Borbély Y, Kröll D, Nett P, Tutuian R (2017) Symptoms, endoscopic findings and reflux monitoring results in candidates for bariatric surgery. Dig Liver Dis 49(7):750–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2017.01.165

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Patel DA, Lappas BM, Vaezi MF (2017) An overview of Achalasia and its subtypes. Gastroenterol Hepatol 13(7):411–421

Google Scholar 

Inoue H, Shiwaku H, Iwakiri K et al (2018) Clinical practice guidelines for peroral endoscopic myotomy. Dig Endosc 30(5):563–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.13239

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kohn GP, Dirks RC, Ansari MT et al (2021) SAGES guidelines for the use of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for the treatment of achalasia. Surg Endosc 35(5):1931–1948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08282-0

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vespa E, Barchi A, Mandarino FV et al (2024) Standard length of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus 37(12):doae069. https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae069

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ramchandani M, Nabi Z, Reddy DN et al (2018) Outcomes of anterior myotomy versus posterior myotomy during POEM: a randomized pilot study. Endosc Int Open 6(2):E190–E198. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-121877

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Tan Y, Lv L, Wang X et al (2018) Efficacy of anterior versus posterior per-oral endoscopic myotomy for treating achalasia: a randomized, prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 88(1):46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2018.03.009

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Khashab MA, Sanaei O, Rivory J et al (2020) Peroral endoscopic myotomy: anterior versus posterior approach: a randomized single-blinded clinical trial. Gastrointest Endosc 91(2):288–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2019.07.034