Clinical Comparison of New Peritoneal Suture and Traditional Suture in Transabdominal Preperitoneal Prosthetic Operation for Inguinal Hernia

 SFX Search Permissions and Reprints Abstract Objectives

This study aimed to assess the efficacy of intraperitoneal suturing for peritoneal closure in preventing adhesions and improving clinical outcomes during laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal prosthetic (TAPP) hernia repair for inguinal hernia.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective cohort study of 126 patients undergoing TAPP herniorrhaphy between November 2021 and November 2022 compared intraperitoneal suture technique (n = 64) versus conventional suturing (n = 62) for peritoneal flap closure. Evaluated parameters included demographic characteristics (age, sex, body mass index [BMI]), operative metrics (suture count, peritoneal closure time), procedural efficacy (complete peritoneal closure rate), and postoperative outcomes encompassing Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, adhesion formation, seroma incidence, recurrence rates, and intestinal obstruction occurrence.

Results

The intraperitoneal suture group achieved significantly higher complete internal inversion success rates (57 [89.1%] vs. 5 [8.1%]; p < 0.001), lower peritoneal adhesion incidence (1 [1.6%] vs. 9 [14.5%]; p = 0.018), and shorter peritoneal suture time (481.20 ± 47.91 vs. 584.77 ± 70.77 minutes; p < 0.001) compared with the traditional suture group. No significant intergroup differences were identified in age, sex, BMI, stitch counts, VAS scores, seroma, recurrence rates, or ileus incidence.

Conclusion

The application of the intraperitoneal suture technique in TAPP to prevent peritoneal adhesion is effective, safe, and easy to learn, with good clinical effect and deserves promotion and application.

Keywords laparoscope - peritoneal suture - TAPP - peritoneal adhesion Data Availability Statement

The datasets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Ethical Approval

This retrospective study was performed by the Declaration of Helsinki of the World Medical Association. It was waived by the Ethics Committee of Laibin People's Hospital, and the informed consent of patients was waived because of its retrospective study.


*These authors contributed equally to this work. The co-first authors.


Publication History

Received: 20 June 2025

Accepted: 06 August 2025

Article published online:
25 August 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

Bibliographical Record
Qiu Jian Qin, Hong Xue Li, Zhong Hui Qin, Si Wen Luo, Hang Zheng, Shang Hui Huang, Yu Ting Liao, Wen Liang Zhu. Clinical Comparison of New Peritoneal Suture and Traditional Suture in Transabdominal Preperitoneal Prosthetic Operation for Inguinal Hernia. Surg J (N Y) 2025; 11: a26777528.
DOI: 10.1055/a-2677-7528

Comments (0)

No login
gif