ALI is a complex clinical syndrome triggered by diverse factors, including pneumonia, sepsis, severe trauma, and acute pancreatitis.1 ALI may progress to ARDS, a condition manifested by acute, widespread pulmonary inflammation, compromised gas exchange, and hypoxemia, with mortality rates reaching 35%–40%.2 The incidence and prognosis of ALI are influenced by variables such as age, gender, seasonality, and lifestyle, underscoring its status as a major public health challenge. The core pathological alterations involve the disruption of the alveolar-capillary barrier, the exudation of protein-rich edema fluid, hyaline membrane formation, and a robust inflammatory response dominated by neutrophil and macrophage infiltration.3,4 Damage to alveolar type II epithelial cells (AECII) not only impairs surfactant production, but also triggers a programmed cell death pathway in which PANopsis (a mode of death integrating apoptosis, pyrosis, and necroapoptosis) has been shown to be a key mechanism driving barrier dysfunction.5
Currently, the clinical management of ALI/ARDS remains predominantly supportive, relying on mechanical ventilation to maintain oxygenation, yet lacking fundamental curative strategies.6–8 Notably, in the wake of the global COVID-19 pandemic, a subset of survivors continues to suffer from varying degrees of pulmonary consolidation and fibrosis, severely impairing quality of life.9
At the molecular level, the progression of ALI/ARDS is driven by redox imbalance and the collapse of immune homeostasis. The disease is characterized by the release of pro-inflammatory mediators—such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6)—alongside reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS).4 Excessive ROS not only induces alveolar epithelial cell apoptosis via oxidative damage, lipid peroxidation, DNA damage, and mitochondrial dysfunction but also amplifies the inflammatory cascade, triggering a cytokine storm.10–12 The progression of ALI is driven by redox imbalance. Excess ROS generated by mitochondrial electron transport chain leakage trigger ROS-induced ROS release effect, resulting in mitochondrial DNA release into the cytoplasm, which in turn activates the cGAS-STING pathway.13 Current pharmacological interventions, primarily glucocorticoids, antibiotics, and neuromuscular blockers, are limited by low pulmonary bioavailability, short half-lives, and severe systemic side effects (eg, immunosuppression, hyperglycemia).14 Consequently, the development of novel agents capable of targeting pulmonary inflammation, exerting dual anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects, and maintaining high biosafety has become a focal point in critical care research.
Given the complexity of ALI/ARDS pathology, an ideal therapeutic strategy must be multifunctional: capable of efficiently traversing the blood-air barrier and mucus layers to reach the lesion, while simultaneously curbing oxidative stress and inflammation to promote tissue repair. Traditional small-molecule drugs struggle to meet these requirements. Nanomedicine offers a breakthrough, with CDs standing out due to their unique physicochemical properties.
The Rise of CDs: A New Star in Pulmonary NanomedicineCDs are quasi-spherical carbon nanomaterials typically smaller than 10 nm.15 Discovered serendipitously by Xu et al in 2004 during the purification of single-walled carbon nanotubes, CDs have pioneered a new field of fluorescent nanomaterials.16 Unlike traditional semiconductor quantum dots (QDs), CDs are composed primarily of carbon, oxygen, and nitrogen, avoiding heavy metals like lead and cadmium, which confers superior biocompatibility and lower toxicity.12,17 Furthermore, their robust photoluminescence, water solubility, resistance to photobleaching, and ease of surface functionalization make them highly advantageous for bioimaging and sensing.18
Advanced synthesis strategies—utilizing specific precursors, doping elements, and surface modifications—have endowed CDs with exceptional optical and functional properties. For instance, Sun et al designed manganese-doped CDs with high T1-weighted imaging performance, enabling dual-mode fluorescence/MRI imaging of tumors.19 Similarly, Wang et al utilized fluorine and nickel co-doped CDs to form stable complexes with Fe3+, achieving significant MRI contrast.20
Beyond imaging, CDs can be engineered with intrinsic antioxidant activities. Surface functional groups (-COOH, -OH, and -NH2) provide abundant electrons, facilitating free radical scavenging.21 Li et al synthesized red-fluorescent CDs with high superoxide dismutase (SOD)-like activity (>4000 U/mg) using glutathione and folate, effectively guiding ALI treatment via imaging.22 Additionally, penicillin-derived CDs have been shown to retain antibacterial activity while reducing bacterial infectivity under visible light, offering new strategies against multi-drug resistant strains.23
In the context of ALI/ARDS, CDs exhibit a unique theranostic advantage. Many metal-doped or specifically synthesized CDs possess nanozyme activity, mimicking natural enzymes like SOD and catalase (CAT) to directly scavenge pulmonary ROS.24 As smart drug carriers, their rich surface chemistry allows for conjugation with anti-inflammatory drugs (eg, dexamethasone), genetic agents (eg, siRNA), or targeting ligands (eg, mannose), enabling targeted pulmonary delivery.25 Furthermore, their fluorescence facilitates the tracing of inflammatory cells and real-time sensing of microenvironmental markers like pH and NO.26
The ability of carriers to penetrate lung physiological barriers must be considered when developing lung diagnostic systems. Traditional nanocarriers such as liposomes and polymeric nanoparticles have been used clinically, but their comparison with CDs shows the innovative advantages of the latter10,27,28 (Table 1).
Table 1 Comparison of Carbon Dots with Liposome and Polymer NPs
Synthesis Strategies and Structural EngineeringThe physicochemical properties of CDs (size, charge, quantum yield) dictate their pulmonary deposition, cellular uptake, and biodistribution. Current synthesis strategies for ALI/ARDS applications focus on green synthesis, heteroatom doping, and targeted surface modification.
Green Synthesis and Biomass PrecursorsTo avoid toxic residues associated with strong acid oxidation, “Green Chemistry” promotes the “bottom-up” synthesis of CDs using natural biomass or pharmacologically active products via hydrothermal or microwave-assisted carbonization.29 For example, CDs derived from bitter almond (Armeniacae Semen Amarum) carbonized at 300°C effectively reduced serum IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α levels in LPS-induced ALI models.30
Synthesizing CDs from drug molecules allows the nanomaterial to inherit and potentially enhance the precursor’s therapeutic function.31 Aspirin-based CDs, synthesized via microwave-assisted methods, retained aspirin’s anti-inflammatory moieties. They demonstrated superior anti-inflammatory efficacy compared to free aspirin in reducing prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) levels, with no significant hepato-renal toxicity.32,33 Similarly, CDs derived from traditional Chinese herbs like Fructus Aurantii and Puerariae lobatae have shown efficacy in suppressing inflammation and cytokine release in gout models.34,35 Garlic-derived CDs, retaining organic sulfur compounds, have also been highlighted for their immunomodulatory potential in COVID-19-associated lung inflammation.36
Sustainable synthesis utilizes food waste and plant extracts (eg, bayberry, orange juice, cabbage) to produce biocompatible CDs with intrinsic anti-inflammatory, anti-gout, and immunomodulatory activities, which are suitable for inhalation delivery.37–41 These methods reduce production costs and facilitate scalability for clinical translation.
Heteroatom Doping and Nanozyme EngineeringPristine CDs often suffer from low quantum yields and limited catalytic activity. Doping with non-metals (N, S, P) or metals (Mn, Cu, Fe) modulates the bandgap and electron distribution, conferring enzyme-mimicking properties.42
Manganese DopingMn-CDs synthesized via hydrothermal methods exhibit multi-enzyme mimetic activities (SOD, CAT, POD, GPx), enabling the cascade scavenging of intracellular O2•−, H2O2, and •OH. This capability is critical for mitigating sepsis-induced oxidative storms.7
Red Emission and Deep Tissue ImagingNovel CDs with high SOD-like activity (>4000 U/mg) and emission at 683 nm allow for deep tissue imaging with minimal background interference.24
Functional TuningThe synthesis temperature of folate-derived CDs significantly impacts carbonization and functional group retention, thereby influencing antibacterial activity and mucosal adhesion—a crucial factor for treating bacteria-associated ARDS.43
Surface Targeting Modification for Pulmonary DeliveryEffective pulmonary delivery must overcome physiological barriers, specifically the airway mucus layer and non-specific uptake by alveolar macrophages.44
Mucus PenetrationThe airway mucus layer traps positively charged nanoparticles via electrostatic interactions. Modifying CDs with maleamic acid creates a surface with neutral or zwitterionic characteristics, minimizing mucin interaction and enhancing penetration and transfection efficiency by orders of magnitude in mucus-producing cell models.45,46
Mannose Receptor TargetingTo target alveolar macrophages (specifically modulating M2 polarization), CDs are functionalized with mannose or D-mannosamine, exploiting the high expression of mannose receptors on these cells for precise uptake.47–49
Integrin TargetingConjugation with RGD (Arginine-Glycine-Aspartic acid) peptides allows CDs to target integrin αvβ3 receptors upregulated on inflamed endothelium and tumor neovasculature, enhancing tissue penetration and imaging signal-to-noise ratios.50–52
It is worth noting that ligand density plays a dual role. While higher density generally increases avidity, excessive surface crowding can lead to steric hindrance, preventing effective receptor binding. Optimal spacing, achieved by using PEG linkers between the CD surface and the RGD/mannose motif, preserves the ligand’s spatial conformation and maximizes cellular uptake efficiency.53,54
Multidimensional Mechanisms in Lung Injury TreatmentCDs intervene in ALI/ARDS not merely as carriers but through complex biological mechanisms involving redox regulation, immunometabolic reprogramming, and gut-lung axis modulation as shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1 Mechanisms of CD-based therapy for ALI, illustrating ROS scavenging, mitochondrial protection, and gut-lung axis modulation.
Antioxidant Enzyme Activity and Mitochondrial ProtectionMitochondria are the epicenter of ROS generation and cell death signaling in ALI/ARDS.55,56 While NADPH oxidase is a known ROS source, evidence suggests that mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC) leakage is the primary driver of the oxidative storm in pathology.57–59 Inflammatory stimuli compromise Complex I and III activity, causing electron leakage and superoxide (O2•−) formation.38 This triggers “ROS-induced ROS release” (RIRR), where local ROS opens the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP), causing a catastrophic release of ROS and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) into the cytosol.59–63 Thus, mitochondria-targeted CDs (mt-CDs) represent a superior therapeutic design (Table 2).
Table 2 Comparison Between Non-Targeted and Mitochondria-Targeted Carbon Dots
Mt-CDsTargeting mitochondria is superior to non-targeted approaches. mt-CDs, often modified with triphenylphosphonium (TPP) or delocalized positive charges, exploit the high negative membrane potential of the mitochondrial matrix to accumulate against the concentration gradient.24,64,65 mt-CDs with SOD mimetic activity quench ROS at the source, preventing the amplification of oxidative damage.7
Anti-Inflammatory DepthBy maintaining mitochondrial integrity, mt-CDs prevent the leakage of oxidized mtDNA (ox-mtDNA). Cytosolic ox-mtDNA is a potent activator of the cGAS-STING pathway, which drives type I interferon and pro-inflammatory cytokine production. Therefore, mt-CDs suppress inflammation at its upstream origin.66,67,69,70
NLRP3 InhibitionMitochondrial ROS are essential for NLRP3 inflammasome activation. ROS-responsive CDs have been shown to restore macrophage mitochondrial potential, thereby inhibiting NLRP3 assembly and IL-1β maturation.68,71–73
Immunomodulation and Anti-Inflammatory SignalingCDs modulate key inflammatory pathways directly or indirectly.
NF-κB InhibitionDrug-loaded or bioactive CDs inhibit IκBα phosphorylation, preventing NF-κB p65 nuclear translocation and downregulating downstream cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6).74,75
Macrophage ReprogrammingPromoting the transition from the pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype to the reparative M2 phenotype is vital for resolution. Mn-CDs have been shown to upregulate M2 markers (Arg-1, CD206), accelerating tissue repair.7
Modulation of the Gut-Lung AxisRecent breakthroughs highlight a remote treatment strategy targeting the gut-lung axis. Sepsis and ARDS are often accompanied by gut dysbiosis.76 Peng et al demonstrated that oral administration of Mn-CDs reversed gut microbiota dysbiosis in septic mice, increasing beneficial genera like Clostridium and Bacteroides.7 Mn-CDs integrate ROS scavenging and multienzyme (CAT/SOD/POD/GPx) catalytic functions, and enzyme activity is dose-dependent, effectively restoring intestinal microbial homeostasis. The mechanism extends beyond simple abundance regulation. Mn-CDs have been shown to act as electron transfer mediators under anaerobic intestinal conditions. They specifically enhance the activity of tryptophan metabolic enzymes (such as tryptophanase), thereby accelerating the conversion of dietary tryptophan into Indole-3-propionic acid (IPA). This shift elevated levels of IPA. IPA enters the circulation and activates the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor (AHR) on pulmonary macrophages, promoting efferocytosis (clearance of apoptotic neutrophils) and anti-inflammatory polarization. This confirms that CDs can treat lung injury via the gut without requiring pulmonary deposition.7,77
Theranostic StrategiesROS-Responsive Drug DeliveryTo minimize systemic toxicity, researchers utilize the high ROS levels in ALI lesions as a trigger. For instance, red-emitting CDs conjugated to methylprednisolone via ROS-cleavable thioketal linkers remain stable physiologically but release the drug and fluorophore rapidly upon encountering inflammatory ROS. This ensures targeted therapy and simultaneous imaging.68 By utilizing Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) or self-quenching mechanisms, the recovery of fluorescence intensity can be linearly correlated with drug release, allowing for semi-quantitative monitoring of dosage in situ.78
siRNA DeliveryCDs act as efficient non-viral vectors for siRNA. Cationic CDs (eg, PEI-modified) condense siRNA via electrostatic interaction and facilitate endosomal escape via the proton sponge effect. For Examples, Folate-PEI-CDs delivering Survivin siRNA for cancer.79 In ALI models, CDs-mediated delivery of TNF-α siRNA significantly downregulated protein levels and reduced pulmonary edema, with lower immunogenicity than viral vectors.80 Interestingly, CDs have even demonstrated the ability to deliver siRNA across rigid plant cell walls, suggesting robust penetration capabilities.81
Unlike naked siRNA which degrades within minutes in serum, CD-complexed siRNA utilizes the “proton sponge effect” of surface amines (eg, PEI) to escape endosomes/lysosomes rapidly. This protection extends the functional half-life of siRNA in lung tissue to 24–48 hours, which is sufficient to suppress the peak expression of inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6) during the acute phase of ALI.25,82
Synergistic Enhancement of Traditional DrugsComplexing hydrophobic flavonoids (eg, Rutin, Quercetin) with CDs improves their water solubility and bioavailability. The intrinsic antioxidant capacity of CDs works synergistically with the drug to enhance anti-inflammatory efficacy.12,83 Furthermore, CD conjugation extends the retention time of drugs in tissues, preventing rapid clearance.84
Precision IdentificationFor infection-induced ALI, distinguishing pathogen strains is critical. Silicon-doped CD probes have achieved 100% accuracy in differentiating hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae from classic strains in mouse pneumonia models, offering a rapid diagnostic tool.85
Bioimaging and Microenvironment SensingIn vivo Fluorescence ImagingWhile traditional blue fluorescence suffers from poor tissue penetration, red and Near-Infrared (NIR) emitting CDs enable clear visualization of drug distribution in the lungs.24 They allow for the real-time tracking of macrophage migration and accumulation at inflammatory sites, providing a visual assessment of disease severity.86
Real-Time Sensing of InflammationNitric Oxide (NO)A ratiometric probe (NFL-NH2) exhibits a fluorescence blue shift (780 nm to 705 nm) upon reaction with NO, detecting concentrations as low as 0.536 nM in inflammatory models.26
Peroxynitrite (ONOO−)Nitrogen-doped CDs serve as fluorescent probes where fluorescence is selectively quenched by nitrite/peroxynitrite, serving as a biochemical marker for oxidative stress.87
pH SensingInflammation creates an acidic microenvironment. pH-sensitive CDs combined with Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microscopy (FLIM) can map intracellular pH distribution, aiding the understanding of lysosomal function and metabolic shifts during inflammation.88,89
Biosafety and ToxicologyInhalation ToxicitySafety is paramount for clinical translation. Unlike Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes (MWCNTs), which can cause frustrated phagocytosis and fibrosis due to their high aspect ratio, spherical CDs generally induce only transient, mild inflammation that resolves quickly.90–95 Cationic CDs (often used for gene delivery) are more cytotoxic, potentially damaging lysosomal integrity and mitochondria. Modifying the surface to be neutral or zwitterionic is a proven strategy to enhance pulmonary safety.25,86
PharmacokineticsUltra-small CDs (<6 nm) are rapidly cleared via renal filtration, minimizing long-term accumulation but limiting therapeutic duration.96 For ALI treatment, enhancing pulmonary retention via liposomal encapsulation or inhalation delivery is often necessary. Systemic administration relies on the “Enhanced Permeability and Retention” (EPR)-like effect caused by vascular leakage in inflamed lungs or active targeting mechanisms.97,98
After 4 months of intravenous or intratracheal administration of PEG modified carbon dots into the bloodstream of mice, there were no abnormalities in blood biochemical parameters and histopathological examination, only age-related natural degeneration was observed.99 Current literature predominantly confirms the safety of neutral CDs over short periods (up to 28 days).100 However, data regarding chronic exposure (>6 months) and potential fibrogenic responses in large animal models (eg, non-human primates) remain a significant gap. Future studies must rigorously evaluate whether permanent retention of non-degradable carbon cores triggers chronic immune activation or granuloma formation.
Conclusion and OutlookRecent advancements (2020–2025) confirm that CDs are not merely passive carriers but active therapeutic agents for ALI/ARDS. Their ability to scavenge ROS, protect mitochondria, and modulate the gut-lung axis—combined with mature green synthesis and doping technologies—offers a versatile platform for precision medicine.
However future challenges remain:
StandardizationThe heterogeneity of CD structures across laboratories hinders reproducible clinical translation.
Imaging DepthWhile red/NIR CDs exist, their quantum yields often lag behind semiconductor QDs. Developing high-brightness NIR-II (1000–1700 nm) CDs is a priority. To address the low quantum yield in the NIR-II window, strategies such as heteroatom co-doping (eg, S, Se) and surface passivation with electron-donating polymers are being developed to suppress non-radiative recombination and enhance brightness.
Long-Term SafetyChronic immune toxicity and the fate of CDs after long-term pulmonary retention require rigorous evaluation in large animal models.
In conclusion, with standardized synthesis and deepened mechanistic understanding, CD-based nanomedicines possessing high biosafety, smart responsiveness, and multimodal imaging capabilities are poised to become powerful weapons in the clinical management of ALI/ARDS.
DisclosureThe authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
References1. Xia L, Zhang C, Lv N, et al. AdMSC-derived exosomes alleviate acute lung injury via transferring mitochondrial component to improve homeostasis of alveolar macrophages. Theranostics. 2022;12(6):2928–11. doi:10.7150/thno.69533
2. Zoulikha M, Xiao Q, Boafo GF, Sallam MA, Chen Z, He W. Pulmonary delivery of siRNA against acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome. Acta pharmaceutica Sinica B. 2022;12(2):600–620. doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2021.08.009
3. Tan W, Qi L, Tan Z. Animal models of infection-induced acute lung injury. Exp Lung Res. 2024;50(1):221–241. doi:10.1080/01902148.2024.2428939
4. Tian L, Jin J, Lu Q, et al. Bidirectional modulation of extracellular vesicle-autophagy axis in acute lung injury: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Biomed Pharmacother. 2024;180:117566. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2024.117566
5. Ziaka M, Exadaktylos A. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: pathophysiological insights, subphenotypes, and clinical implications—a comprehensive review. J Clin Med. 2025;14(15):5184. doi:10.3390/jcm14155184
6. Gao Y, Cao F, Tian X, et al. Inhibition the ubiquitination of ENaC and Na, K-ATPase with erythropoietin promotes alveolar fluid clearance in sepsis-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome. Biomed Pharmacother. 2024;174:116447. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2024.116447
7. Peng L, Song H, Shi H, et al. Oral multi-enzymatic manganese-carbon dots alleviate sepsis-associated lung injury via the gut-lung axis. ACS nano. 2025;19(43):37758–37782. doi:10.1021/acsnano.5c10625
8. Zhang Y, Wang H, Yang R, et al. Synergistic therapeutic effects of D-mannitol-cerium-quercetin (Rutin) coordination polymer nanoparticles on acute lung injury. Molecules. 2024;29(12). doi:10.3390/molecules29122819
9. John AE, Joseph C, Jenkins G, Tatler AL. COVID-19 and pulmonary fibrosis: a potential role for lung epithelial cells and fibroblasts. Immunol Rev. 2021;302(1):228–240. doi:10.1111/imr.12977
10. Zhang Y, Sun W, Wang M, et al. Application of nanoparticles in the treatment of acute lung injury: current situation and future directions. Mater Today Bio. 2025;34:102199. doi:10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.102199
11. Wang H, Hsu JC, Song W, Lan X, Cai W, Ni D. Nanorepair medicine for treatment of organ injury. Natl Sci Rev. 2024;11(9):nwae280. doi:10.1093/nsr/nwae280
12. He Q, Zhang L. Strategic engineering of carbon dots: multi-enzyme mimetics for advanced biomedical intervention in oxidative stress-related diseases. RSC Adv. 2025;15(42):35421–35435. doi:10.1039/d5ra05474e
13. Koç ÖK, Üzer A, Apak R. High quantum yield nitrogen-doped carbon quantum dot-based fluorescent probes for selective sensing of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene. ACS Appl Nano Mater. 2022;5(4):5868–5881. doi:10.1021/acsanm.2c00717
14. Yang X, Niu H, Jiang W, Yu W, Jiang W. Application of pharmaceutical nanotechnologies for chinese herbal medicines in the treatment of pulmonary diseases and lung cancer. Int J Nanomed. 2025;20:10567–10593. doi:10.2147/ijn.S541866
15. Rui S, Song L, Lan J, et al. Recent advances in carbon dots-based nanoplatforms: physicochemical properties and biomedical applications. Chem Eng J. 2023;476:146593. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2023.146593
16. Xu X, Ray R, Gu Y, et al. Electrophoretic analysis and purification of fluorescent single-walled carbon nanotube fragments. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126(40):12736–12737. doi:10.1021/ja040082h
17. Ren L, Wang L, Rehberg M, Stoeger T, Zhang J, Chen S. Applications and immunological effects of quantum dots on respiratory system. Front Immunol. 2021;12:795232. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.795232
18. Wang J, Fu Y, Gu Z, et al. Multifunctional carbon dots for biomedical applications: diagnosis, therapy, and theranostic. Small. 2024;20(3):e2303773. doi:10.1002/smll.202303773
19. Sun S, Zhao L, Wu D, et al. Manganese-doped carbon dots with redshifted orange emission for enhanced fluorescence and magnetic resonance imaging. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2021;4(2):1969–1975. doi:10.1021/acsabm.0c01597
20. Wang J, Hu X, Ding H, et al. Fluorine and nitrogen co-doped carbon dot complexation with Fe(III) as a T(1) contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(20):18203–18212. doi:10.1021/acsami.9b03644
21. Li J, Zhou Y, Xiao Y, et al. Carbon dots as light-responsive oxidase-like nanozyme for colorimetric detection of total antioxidant capacity in fruits. Food Chem. 2023;405(Pt A):134749. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134749
22. Li L, Yang J, Wei J, et al. SERS monitoring of photoinduced-enhanced oxidative stress amplifier on Au@carbon dots for tumor catalytic therapy. Light Sci Appl. 2022;11(1):286. doi:10.1038/s41377-022-00968-5
23. Sidhu JS, Mayank Pandiyan T, Kaur N, Singh N. The photochemical degradation of bacterial cell wall using penicillin‐based carbon dots: weapons against Multi‐Drug Resistant (MDR) Strains. ChemistrySelect. 2017;2:9277–83.
24. Cui L, Fan W, Cheng WX, et al. Red emissive carbon dot superoxide dismutase nanozyme for bioimaging and ameliorating acute lung injury. Adv Funct Mater. 2023;33. doi:10.1002/adfm.202213856
25. Zhu J, Guo M, Cui Y, et al. Surface coating of pulmonary siRNA delivery vectors enabling mucus penetration, cell targeting, and intracellular radical scavenging for enhanced acute lung injury therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022;14(4):5090–5100. doi:10.1021/acsami.1c23069
26. Han T, Sun Y, Zhao C, Wang HY, Yu H, Liu Y. Mitochondrial-targeted ratiometric near-infrared fluorescence probe for monitoring nitric oxide in rheumatoid arthritis. J Med Chem. 2024;67(5):4026–4035. doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c02344
27. Zhang X, Tu S, Tian J, et al. Liposome-based nanoparticle delivery systems for lung diseases: opportunities and challenges. Int J Nanomed. 2025;20:12485–12509. doi:10.2147/ijn.S538382
28. Liu Q, Zhang X, Xue J, et al. Exploring the intrinsic micro-/nanoparticle size on their in vivo fate after lung delivery. J Control Release. 2022;347:435–448. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.05.006
29. Wang H, Fang Y, Ji Y, Ren J. Review of pharmacologically active carbon dots as versatile nanotherapeutics. ACS Appl Nano Mater. 2025;8(36):17356–17377. doi:10.1021/acsanm.5c03216
30. Zhao Y, Zhang Y, Kong H, Cheng G, Qu H, Zhao Y. Protective effects of carbon dots derived from armeniacae semen amarum carbonisata against acute lung injury induced by lipopolysaccharides in rats. Int J Nanomed. 2022;17:1–14. doi:10.2147/ijn.S338886
31. Wu ZF, Luo XX, Shi XF, et al. Carbon dots derived from organic drug molecules with improved therapeutic effects and new functions. Nanoscale. 2025;17(9):4958–4973. doi:10.1039/d4nr04467c
32. Xu X, Zhang K, Zhao L, et al. Aspirin-based carbon dots, a good biocompatibility of material applied for bioimaging and anti-inflammation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8(48):32706–32716. doi:10.1021/acsami.6b12252
33. Sharma A, Choi HK, Lee HJ. Carbon dots for the treatment of inflammatory diseases: an appraisal of in vitro and in vivo studies. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2023;2023:3076119. doi:10.1155/2023/3076119
34. Wang S, Zhang Y, Kong H, et al. Antihyperuricemic and anti-gouty arthritis activities of Aurantii fructus immaturus carbonisata-derived carbon dots. Nanomedicine. 2019;14(22):2925–2939. doi:10.2217/nnm-2019-0255
35. Wang X, Zhang Y, Zhang M, et al. Novel carbon dots derived from Puerariae lobatae radix and their anti-gout effects. Molecules. 2019;24(22):4152. doi:10.3390/molecules24224152
36. Kalkal A, Allawadhi P, Pradhan R, Khurana A, Bharani KK, Packirisamy G. Allium sativum derived carbon dots as a potential theranostic agent to combat the COVID-19 crisis. Sens Int. 2021;2:100102. doi:10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100102
37. Sharma N, Lee HJ. Biomass-derived carbon dots as fluorescent probes for label-free sensing of hemin and as radical scavengers. Biosensors. 2025;15(2):105. doi:10.3390/bios15020105
38. Shang J, Zhou Q, Wang K, Wei Y. Engineering of green carbon dots for biomedical and biotechnological applications. Molecules. 2024;29(18):4508. doi:10.3390/molecules29184508
39. Muangmora R, Kemacheevakul P, Chuangchote S. Fiberglass cloth coated by coffee ground waste-derived carbon quantum dots/titanium dioxide composite for removal of caffeine and other pharmaceuticals from water. Heliyon. 2023;9(7):e17693. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17693
40. Ghataty DS, Amer RI, Amer MA, Abdel Rahman MF, Shamma RN. Green synthesis of highly fluorescent carbon dots from bovine serum albumin for linezolid drug delivery as potential wound healing biomaterial: bio-synergistic approach, antibacterial activity, and in vitro and ex vivo evaluation. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(1):234. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15010234
41. Architha N, Ragupathi M, Shobana C, et al. Microwave-assisted green synthesis of fluorescent carbon quantum dots from Mexican Mint extract for Fe(3+) detection and bio-imaging applications. Environ Res. 2021;199:111263. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2021.111263
42. Liu Z, Wang J, Chen Z, Wang Y. Carbon dots based nanozymes: synthesis, structure, catalytic mechanisms and applications. Colloids Surf B. 2026;257:115194. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2025.115194
43. Longobardo G, Della Sala F, Marino G, et al. One-step synthesized folic acid-based carbon dots: a biocompatible nanomaterial for the treatment of bacterial infections in lung pathologies. Nanomaterials. 2025;15(21):1657. doi:10.3390/nano15211657
44. Murgia X, Cristiane DSC, Lehr CM. Overcoming the pulmonary barrier: new insights to improve the efficiency of inhaled therapeutics. Eur J Nanomed. 2014;6(3):157–69.
45. Arca S, Witjaksono C, Pons F, Lebeau L. Carbon dots with tunable charge as mucus-penetrating gene carriers. Pharmaceutics. 2025;17(10):1330. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics17101330
46. Arca S, Pons F, Lebeau L. Engineered carbon dots for mucosal gene delivery. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2025;213:107222. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2025.107222
47. Luan H, Peng C, Yasin P, Shang Q, Xiang W, Song X. Mannosamine-engineered nanoparticles for precision rifapentine delivery to macrophages: advancing targeted therapy against mycobacterium tuberculosis. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2025;19:2081–2102. doi:10.2147/dddt.S505682
48. Lin J, Yang L, Liu T, et al. Mannose-modified exosomes loaded with MiR-23b-3p target alveolar macrophages to alleviate acute lung injury in sepsis. J Control Release. 2025;379:832–847. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.01.073
49. Kuznetsova AB, Gorbacheva VI, Kolesova EP, Egorova VS. Tailoring of albumin nanoparticles modified with mannose for effective targeting in immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Micro. 2025;5(2):30.
50. Wang K, Xiang Y, Pan W, Wang H, Li N, Tang B. Dual-targeted photothermal agents for enhanced cancer therapy. Chem Sci. 2020;11(31):8055–8072. doi:10.1039/d0sc03173a
51. Li Y, Li C, Li J, et al. Enhanced tumor targeting and penetration of fluorophores via iRGD peptide conjugation: a strategy for the precision targeting of lung cancer. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2024;13(8):2000–2014. doi:10.21037/tlcr-24-589
52. Cai W, Shin DW, Chen K, et al. Peptide-labeled near-infrared quantum dots for imaging tumor vasculature in living subjects. Nano Lett. 2006;6(4):669–676. doi:10.1021/nl052405t
53. Elias DR, Poloukhtine A, Popik V, Tsourkas A. Effect of ligand density, receptor density, and nanoparticle size on cell targeting. Nanomedicine. 2013;9(2):194–201. doi:10.1016/j.nano.2012.05.015
54. Alkilany A, Zhu L, Weller H, et al. Ligand density on nanoparticles: a parameter with critical impact on nanomedicine. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 2019;143:22–36. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2019.05.010
55. Shan M, Zhang S, Luo Z, et al. Itaconate promotes inflammatory responses in tissue-resident alveolar macrophages and exacerbates acute lung injury. Cell Metab. 2025;37(8):1750–1765.e7. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2025.05.012
56. Hou F, Shi N, Yuan H, et al. Targeting alveolar macrophages: a promising intervention for pulmonary infection and acute lung injury. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2025;30(1):69. doi:10.1186/s11658-025-00750-6
57. Zeng L, Yan J. Mechanisms of alveolar type II epithelial cells’ mitochondrial quality control during acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome: bridging the gap between oxidative stress, inflammation, and fibrosis. Front Physiol. 2025;16:1684729. doi:10.3389/fphys.2025.1684729
58. Jaara HS, Torres S. Mitochondrial ROS, a trigger for mitochondrial dysfunction and inflammasome activation and a therapeutic target in liver diseases. Exp Digest Dis. 2024;3(6):474–503. doi:10.37349/edd.2024.00062
59. Narala VR, Narala SR, Aiya Subramani P, Panati K, Kolliputi N. Role of mitochondria in inflammatory lung diseases. Front Pharmacol. 2024;15:1433961. doi:10.3389/fphar.2024.1433961
60. Murphy MP. How mitochondria produce reactive oxygen species. Biochem J. 2009;417(1):1–13. doi:10.1042/bj20081386
61. Millare B, O’Rourke B, Trayanova N. Hydrogen peroxide diffusion and scavenging shapes mitochondrial network instability and failure by sensitizing ROS-induced ROS release. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):15758. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-71308-z
62. Zorov DB, Juhaszova M, Sollott SJ. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) and ROS-induced ROS release. Physiol Rev. 2014;94(3):909–950. doi:10.1152/physrev.00026.2013
63. Yue C, Yang Y, Zhang C, et al. ROS-responsive mitochondria-targeting blended nanoparticles: chemo- and photodynamic synergistic therapy for lung cancer with on-demand drug release upon irradiation with a single light source. Theranostics. 2016;6(13):2352–2366. doi:10.7150/thno.15433
64. Broome SC, Woodhead JST, Merry TL. Mitochondria-targeted antioxidants and skeletal muscle function. Antioxidants. 2018;7(8):107. doi:10.3390/antiox7080107
65. Li X, Li Y, Du M, et al. Target-oriented synthesis of triphenylphosphine functionalized carbon dots with negative charge for ROS scavenging and mitochondrial targeting. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2024;16(22):28991–29002. doi:10.1021/acsami.4c01382
66. Tian Z, Ni R, Zheleznova NN, et al. Acute kidney injury induces lung damage via mitochondrial DAMPs by activating TREM-1 and cGAS-STING pathways. Cells. 2025;14(21):1716. doi:10.3390/cells14211716
67. Huang X, Liang N, Zhang F, Lin W, Ma W. Lovastatin-induced mitochondrial oxidative stress leads to the release of mtdna to promote apoptosis by activating cGAS-STING pathway in human colorectal cancer cells. Antioxidants. 2024;13(6):679. doi:10.3390/antiox13060679
68. Fan W, Tang Y, Liu Y, et al. ROS-responsive nanoparticles for bioimaging and treating acute lung injury by releasing dexamethasone and improving alveolar macrophage homeostasis. J Nanobiotechnol. 2024;22(1):729. doi:10.1186/s12951-024-03015-0
69. Chen J, Liang S, Li C, et al. Mitochondrial damage causes inflammation via cGAS-STING signaling in ketamine-induced cystitis. Inflammation Res. 2025;74(1):6. doi:10.1007/s00011-024-01973-7
70. Long G, Gong R, Wang Q, Zhang D, Huang C. Role of released mitochondrial DNA in acute lung injury. Front Immunol. 2022;13:973089. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.973089
71. Zhang X, Zeng W, Zhang Y, et al. Focus on the role of mitochondria in NLRP3 inflammasome activation: a prospective target for the treatment of ischemic stroke (Review). IntJ Mol Med. 2022;49(6). doi:10.3892/ijmm.2022.5130
72. Puri G, Naura AS. Implication of mitochondrial ROS-NLRP3 inflammasome axis during two-hit mediated acute lung injury in mice. Free Radic Res. 2022;56(1):1–16. doi:10.1080/10715762.2021.2023740
73. Jabaut J, Ather JL, Taracanova A, Poynter ME, Ckless K. Mitochondria-targeted drugs enhance Nlrp3 inflammasome-dependent IL-1β secretion in association with alterations in cellular redox and energy status. Free Radic Biol Med. 2013;60:233–245. doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.01.025
74. Hu Z, Song B, Xu L, et al. Aqueous synthesized quantum dots interfere with the NF-κB pathway and confer anti-tumor, anti-viral and anti-inflammatory effects. Biomaterials. 2016;108:187–196. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.08.047
75. Lien HW, Kuo YY, Chang YH, et al. Electromagnetic wireless remote control of reprogramming immune dysfunction via N-doped carbon dots-mesoporous silica-mediated cuproptosis and dendritic cell retention. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2025;15(6):e02817. doi:10.1002/adhm.202502817
76. Liu J, Hong W, Sun Z, Zhang S, Xue C, Dong N. The gut-lung axis: effects and mechanisms of gut microbiota on pulmonary diseases. Front Immunol. 2025;16:1693964. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1693964
77. Gao H, Sun M, Li A, et al. Microbiota-derived IPA alleviates intestinal mucosal inflammation through upregulating Th1/Th17 cell apoptosis in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut Microbes. 2025;17(1):2467235. doi:10.1080/19490976.2025.2467235
78. Tang J, Kong B, Wu H, et al. Carbon nanodots featuring efficient FRET for real-time monitoring of drug delivery and two-photon imaging. Adv Mater. 2013;25(45):6569–6574. doi:10.1002/adma.201303124
79. Xue W, Du J, Wei Y, et al. Construction of cationic carbon dots carrying survivin siRNA delivery system and its active targeting therapy for liver cancer. Int J Nanomed. 2025;20:6831–6851. doi:10.2147/ijn.S521972
80. Wang Q, Achour J, Emam L, et al. Pulmonary delivery of siRNA anti-TNFα-loaded lipid nanoparticles for rapid recovery in murine acute lung injury. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2025;14(29):e00695. doi:10.1002/adhm.202500695
81. Schwartz SH, Hendrix B, Hoffer P, Sanders RA, Zheng W. Carbon dots for efficient small interfering RNA delivery and gene silencing in plants. Plant Physiology. 2020;184(2):647–657. doi:10.1104/pp.20.00733
82. Algarra M, Gonzalez-Muñoz E. Efficient and scalable gene delivery method with easily generated cationic carbon dots. Biol Proced Online. 2024;26(1):6. doi:10.1186/s12575-024-00232-7
83. Kong B, Yang T, Cheng F, et al. Carbon dots as nanocatalytic medicine for anti-inflammation therapy. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2022;611:545–553. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2021.12.107
84. Li J, Feng X, Jiang H, et al. Near-infrared and pH-responsive carbon dots/bergenin for biological imaging and chemo-photothermal synergistic tumor therapy. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2025;694:137679. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2025.137679
85. Huang L, Du B, Cui X, et al. Absolute quantitative detection of hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae using a novel silicon-doped carbon quantum dot-probe-graphene oxide. ACS Sens. 2025;10(8):5633–5643. doi:10.1021/acssensors.5c00508
86. Weiss M, Fan J, Claudel M, Lebeau L, Pons F, Ronzani C. Combined in vitro and in vivo approaches to propose a putative adverse outcome pathway for acute lung inflammation induced by nanoparticles: a study on carbon dots. Nanomaterials. 2021;11(1):180. doi:10.3390/nano11010180
87. Feng Z, Li Z, Zhang X, Shi Y, Zhou N. Nitrogen-doped carbon quantum dots as fluorescent probes for sensitive and selective detection of nitrite. Molecules. 2017;22(12):2061. doi:10.3390/molecules22122061
88. Huang M, Liang X, Zhang Z, et al. Carbon Dots for Intracellular pH Sensing with Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microscopy. Nanomaterials. 2020;10(4):604. doi:10.3390/nano10040604
89. Guo H, Lesani P, Zreiqat H, New EJ. A fluorescent sensor array based on carbon dots for the accurate determination of pH. Sens Diagn. 2024;3(12).
90. Jo MS, Kim BW, Kim YH, et al. The acute and short-term inhalation of carbon nanofiber in sprague-dawley rats. Biomolecules. 2022;12(10):1351. doi:10.3390/biom12101351
91. Danielsen PH, Poulsen SS, Mortensen A, et al. Imogolite nanotube modifications impact pulmonary toxicity in mice: implications for safe and sustainable by design (SSbD). J Nanobiotechnol. 2025;23(1):571. doi:10.1186/s12951-025-03647-w
92. Zhou X, Jin W, Ma J. Lung inflammation perturbation by engineered nanoparticles. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;11:1199230. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2023.1199230
93. Mitchell LA, Gao J, Wal RV, Gigliotti A, Burchiel SW, McDonald JD. Pulmonary and systemic immune response to inhaled multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Toxicol Sci. 2007;100(1):203–214. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfm196
94. Horie M, Stowe M, Kambara T, et al. Pulmonary inflammation of well-dispersed multi-wall carbon nanotubes following intratracheal instillation: toxicity by fiber of 1–5 m in length. Materials. 2012;5(12):2833–49.
95. Guo C, Wright MD, Buckley A, et al. Pulmonary toxicity of long, thick MWCNT and very long, thin carboxylated MWCNT aerosols following 28 days whole-body exposure. Toxics. 2025;13(5):401. doi:10.3390/toxics13050401
96. Tegafaw T, Mulugeta E, Zhao D, et al. Surface modification, toxicity, and applications of carbon dots to cancer theranosis: a review. Nanomaterials. 2025;15(11):781. doi:10.3390/nano15110781
97. Nguyen DHH, El-Ramady H, Törős G, et al. Food-derived carbon dots: formation, detection, and impact on gut microbiota. Foods. 2025;14(17):2980. doi:10.3390/foods14172980
98. Alexander E, Leong KW. Toxicity and biodistribution comparison of functionalized nanodiamonds, quantum dot nanocarbons and gold nanoparticles. Front Nanotechnol. 2025;7. doi:10.3389/fnano.2025.1512622
99. Schipper M, Nakayama-Ratchford N, Davis C, et al. A pilot toxicology study of single-walled carbon nanotubes in a small sample of mice. Nature Nanotechnol. 2008;3:216–221. doi:10.1038/nnano.2008.68
100. Yang Y, Ren X, Sun Z, et al. Toxicity and bio-distribution of carbon dots after single inhalation exposure in vivo. Chin Chem Lett. 2018;29(6):895–898. doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2018.04.018
Comments (0)