The end-of-career stage of the police lifecycle represents a profound shift in identity and psychological stability, yet it remains historically neglected in research. This mixed-methods study investigated perspectives of UK police leavers and those approaching retirement (N = 325) regarding desired improvements to organisational support. Content analysis identified four themes: ‘Holistic support and long-term welfare’, ‘Institutional culture and professional worth’, ‘Navigating the structural transition’, and ‘Individual and systemic perspectives’. Findings suggest that the psychological contract between the officer and the organisation is often breached at the exit point, shifting from a relational bond to a transactional disposal. Middle-ranking officers and early leavers report the highest levels of institutional abandonment. To address these gaps, this paper makes recommendations for developing effective transitions. By implementing post□service welfare, and adopting structured resettlement models, police organisations can fulfil their duty of care and mend the psychological contract for those who have served.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

This study did not receive any funding

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethics approval was granted by the Humanities, Social, and Health Sciences Research Ethics Panel at the University of Bradford (Reference Number E1350). All respondents provided written informed consent.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data are available from the authors upon reasonable request.