Objectives: To evaluate supply-chain vulnerabilities affecting medications essential for treating sexually transmitted infection in the United States and identify disruption mechanisms that may predispose these therapies to shortages. Methods: We conducted a qualitative, structured supply-chain vulnerability assessment of first-line medications for five priority sexually transmitted pathogens recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization: azithromycin, doxycycline, ceftriaxone, benzathine penicillin G, metronidazole, tinidazole, acyclovir, and cefixime. Using a predefined framework derived from pharmaceutical supply-chain disruption literature, we evaluated 13 disruption categories spanning raw material sourcing, active pharmaceutical ingredient production, manufacturing, distribution, market dynamics, information systems, and post-distribution loss mechanisms. Each category was assessed using four binary indicators and classified as relevant when at least two criteria were satisfied. Results: Multiple disruption domains applied across the drug set. Recurrent vulnerabilities included geographically concentrated active pharmaceutical ingredient production, limited manufacturing redundancy in low-margin generic markets, manufacturing constraints affecting sterile injectable products, reliance on consolidated distribution networks, and susceptibility to demand surges and information-system disruptions. All eight drugs exhibited at least one regulatory or market signal consistent with potential supply vulnerability, including documented shortages, product discontinuations, or limited manufacturer participation. Conclusions: Supply-chain vulnerabilities were identified across multiple first-line sexually transmitted infection therapies, indicating that disruption risk is not confined to a single drug. There is a need for policy interventions to strengthen supply-chain resilience, including diversification of active pharmaceutical ingredient sourcing and distribution networks, as well as incentives for sustainable generic production.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

This work was supported in part by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (K23AI182453 to LAB)

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data supporting this study is available upon request. A detailed spreadsheet containing the data, along with source links, can be accessed by contacting the corresponding author.