Artificial Intelligence Use in Menopause Care

Williams RE, et al. Healthcare seeking and treatment for menopausal symptoms in the United States. Maturitas. 2007;58(4):348–58.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Paramsothy P, et al. Duration of the menopausal transition is longer in women with young age at onset: the multi-ethnic Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation. Volume 24. New York, NY: Menopause; 2017. p. 142. 2.

Google Scholar 

Faubion SS, et al. The 2022 hormone therapy position statement of The North American Menopause Society. Menopause. 2022;29(7):767–94.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rocca WA et al. Accelerated accumulation of multimorbidity after bilateral oophorectomy: a population-based cohort study. in Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2016. Elsevier.

Rush SK, et al. A Revised Markov Model Evaluating Oophorectomy at the Time of Hysterectomy for Benign Indication: Age 65 Years Revisited. Obstet Gynecol. 2022;139(5):735.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Orleans RJ, et al. FDA Approval of Paroxetine for Menopausal Hot Flushes. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(19):1777–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Harris E. Nonhormone Treatment for Menopausal Hot Flashes Receives FDA Approval. JAMA. 2023;329(22):1907–1907.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Davis SR, Pinkerton J, Santoro N, Simoncini T. Menopause-Biology, consequences, supportive care, and therapeutic options. Cell. 2023;186(19):4038–4058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2023.08.016

Langer R, et al. Hormone replacement therapy–where are we now? Climacteric. 2021;24(1):3–10.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kling JM, et al. Menopause Management Knowledge in Postgraduate Family Medicine, Internal Medicine, and Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents: A Cross-Sectional Survey. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019;94(2):242–53.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sarrel PM. A call to increase the use of hormone therapy to prevent disease in symptomatic postmenopausal women. Menopause. 2019;26(6):573–5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

IBM. AI vs. machine learning vs. deep learning vs. neural networks. 2025 September 30, 2025]; Available from: https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/ai-vs-machine-learning-vs-deep-learning-vs-neural-networks

Blease C, et al. Generative Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: Qualitative Study of UK General Practitioners’ Views. J Med Internet Res. 2025;27:e74428.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Tierney AA, et al. Ambient Artificial Intelligence Scribes: Learnings after 1 Year and over 2.5 Million Uses. NEJM Catalyst. 2025;6(5):pCAT250040.

Article  Google Scholar 

Smith DP, et al. Expert-Augmented Computational Drug Repurposing Identified Baricitinib as a Treatment for COVID-19. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:709856.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Özçelik R, et al. Structure-Based Drug Discovery with Deep Learning. ChemBioChem. 2023;24(13):e202200776.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Stokes JM, et al. A Deep Learning Approach to Antibiotic Discovery. Cell. 2020;180(4):688–e70213.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

El Mertahi A, et al. AI-driven skin cancer detection from smartphone images: A hybrid model using ViT, adaptive thresholding, black-hat transformation, and XGBoost. PLoS ONE. 2025;20(7):e0328402.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hernström V, et al. Screening performance and characteristics of breast cancer detected in the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence trial (MASAI): a randomised, controlled, parallel-group, non-inferiority, single-blinded, screening accuracy study. Lancet Digit Health. 2025;7(3):e175–83.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hassan C, Spadaccini M, Mori Y, Foroutan F, Facciorusso A, Gkolfakis P, Tziatzios G, Triantafyllou K, Antonelli G, Khalaf K, Rizkala T, Vandvik PO, Fugazza A, Rondonotti E, Glissen-Brown JR, Kamba S, Maida M, Correale L, Bhandari P, Jover R, Sharma P, Rex DK, Repici A. Real-Time Computer-Aided Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia During Colonoscopy : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2023;76(9):1209–1220. https://doi.org/10.7326/M22-3678

Leibetseder A, et al. GLENDA: Gynecologic Laparoscopy Endometriosis Dataset. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020.

Google Scholar 

Mao D, et al. AI-MARRVEL — A Knowledge-Driven AI System for Diagnosing Mendelian Disorders. NEJM AI. 2024;1(5):AIoa2300009.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ferber D, et al. Development and validation of an autonomous artificial intelligence agent for clinical decision-making in oncology. Nat Cancer. 2025;6(8):1337–49.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Administration, U.S.F.D. Artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML)-enabled medical devices. 2025 September 30, 2025]; Available from: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/software-medical-device-samd/artificial-intelligence-enabled-medical-devices

Utian WH, Schiff I. NAMS-gallup survey on women’s knowledge, information sources, and attitudes to menopause and hormone replacement therapy. Menopause. 2018;25(11):1172–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wiederhold BK. Femtech: Digital Help for Women’s Health Care Across the Life Span. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2021;24(11):697–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cromack SC, Walter JR. Consumer wearables and personal devices for tracking the fertile window. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024;231(5):516–23.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Singh S. Algorithmic Detection of Hormonal Patterns. Iconic Res Eng Journals. 2025;8(11):1058–80.

Google Scholar 

Zhao X, et al. Using machine learning models to identify severe subjective cognitive decline and related factors in nurses during the menopause transition: a pilot study. Menopause. 2025;32(4):295–305.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ali MM, et al. Development and performance analysis of machine learning methods for predicting depression among menopausal women. Healthc Analytics. 2023;3:100202.

Article  Google Scholar 

Garg R, Munshi A. Revolutionizing Menopause Management: Harnessing the Potential of Artificial Intelligence. J Midlife Health. 2024;15(2):53–4.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Steinberg JR, et al. Analysis of Female Enrollment and Participant Sex by Burden of Disease in US Clinical Trials Between 2000 and 2020. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(6):e2113749–2113749.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Temkin SM, et al. Chronic conditions in women: the development of a National Institutes of health framework. BMC Womens Health. 2023;23(1):162.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rickman S. Evaluating gender bias in large language models in long-term care. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak. 2025;25(1):274.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gourabathina A et al. The Medium is the Message: How Non-Clinical Information Shapes Clinical Decisions in LLMs, in Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 2025:1805–1828.

Harlow SD, et al. Disparities in Reproductive Aging and Midlife Health between Black and White women: The Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Womens Midlife Health. 2022;8(1):3.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Menon AK, Williamson RC. The cost of fairness in binary classification. in Conference on Fairness, accountability and transparency. 2018. PMLR.

Comments (0)

No login
gif