Clement PB, Scully RE (1974) Müllerian adenosarcoma of the uterus: A clinicopathologic analysis of ten cases of a distinctive type of müllerian mixed tumor. Cancer 34(4):1138–1149.
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Seagle B-LL, Kanis M, Strohl AE, Shahabi S (2016) Survival of women with Mullerian adenosarcoma: A National Cancer Data Base study. Gynecol Oncol 143(3):636–641.
WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board (2020) Female Genital Tumours. WHO Classification of Tumours, 5th ed., vol. 4. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon
Yu EH, Song YJ, Lee SY, Hwang SY, Lee NK, Choi KU et al (2020) Mullerian adenosarcoma of the uterine cervix misdiagnosed as an endocervical polyp on magnetic resonance imaging and two preoperative consecutive biopsies: A diagnostic challenge. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 41(6):1045.
Howitt BE, Quade BJ, Nucci MR (2015) Uterine polyps with features overlapping with those of Müllerian adenosarcoma: a clinicopathologic analysis of 29 cases emphasizing their likely benign nature. Am J Surg Pathol 39(1):116–126.
Akış S, Kıran G, Göçmen A (2022) The clinical importance of polyp size measurement through two-dimensional saline infusion sonohysterography prior to hysteroscopic resection in predicting premalignant and malignant endometrial lesions. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 157(3):582–587.
Fujii S, Nosaka K, Mukuda N, Fukunaga T, Sato S, Ogawa T (2018) MR Imaging of an Intramural Adenosarcoma with Pathologic Correlation. Magn Reson Med Sci 17(1):1–2.
Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K, Yoshida S, Kudo E, Bando Y, Hasebe H et al (2009) Adenosarcoma of the uterus: magnetic resonance imaging characteristics. Clin Imaging 33(3):244–247.
Wang Q, Sun S, Cai J, Yang L, Lv G, Yang Q (2023) Uterine adenosarcoma: a case report and review of the literature. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 13(2):70–76.
PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Santos P, Cunha TM (2015) Uterine sarcomas: clinical presentation and MRI features. Diagn Interv Radiol 21(1):4–9.
Hase S, Mitsumori A, Inai R, Takemoto M, Matsubara S, Akamatsu N et al (2012) Endometrial Polyps:MR Imaging Features. Acta Med. Okayama 66(6):475–485.
Kaku T, Silverberg SG, Major FJ, Miller A, Fetter B, Brady MF (1992) Adenosarcoma of the uterus: a Gynecologic Oncology Group clinicopathologic study of 31 cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol 11(2):75–88.
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Arend R, Bagaria M, Lewin SN, Sun X, Deutsch I, Burke WM et al (2010) Long-term outcome and natural history of uterine adenosarcomas. Gynecol Oncol 119(2):305–308.
Carroll A, Ramirez PT, Westin SN, Soliman PT, Munsell MF, Nick AM et al (2014) Uterine adenosarcoma: an analysis on management, outcomes, and risk factors for recurrence. Gynecol Oncol 135(3):455–461.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Clement PB (1989) Müllerian adenosarcomas of the uterus with sarcomatous overgrowth. A clinicopathological analysis of 10 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 13(1):28–38.
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Tse KY, Crawford R, Ngan HYS (2011) Staging of uterine sarcomas. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 25(6):733–749.
Nakai G, Matsutani H, Yamada T, Ohmichi M, Yamamoto K, Osuga K (2021) Imaging findings of uterine adenosarcoma with sarcomatous overgrowth: two case reports, emphasizing restricted diffusion on diffusion weighted imaging. BMC Womens Health 21(1):416.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gladwish A, Milosevic M, Fyles A, Xie J, Halankar J, Metser U et al (2016) Association of apparent diffusion coefficient with disease recurrence in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with radical chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Radiology 279(1):158–166.
Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48(3):452–458.
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Yoshizako T, Wada A, Kitagaki H, Ishikawa N, Miyazaki K (2011) MR imaging of uterine adenosarcoma: case report and literature review. Magn Reson Med Sci 10(4):251–254.
Nijkang NP, Anderson L, Markham R, Manconi F (2019) Endometrial polyps: Pathogenesis, sequelae and treatment. SAGE Open Med 7:1–12.
Rechichi G, Galimberti S, Signorelli M, Franzesi CT, Perego P, Valsecchi MG et al (2011) Endometrial Cancer: Correlation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient With Tumor Grade, Depth of Myometrial Invasion, and Presence of Lymph Node Metastases. Am. J. Roentgenol 197(1):256–262.
Kishimoto K, Tajima S, Maeda I, Takagi M, Ueno T, Suzuki N et al (2016) Endometrial cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with tumor cellularity and tumor grade. Acta Radiol 57(8): 1021–1028.
Moharamzad Y, Davarpanah AH, Yaghobi Joybari A, Shahbazi F, Esmaeilian Toosi L, Kooshkiforooshani M et al (2021) Diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for differentiating endometrial carcinoma from benign lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Abdom. Radiol. 46(3):1115–1128.
Comments (0)