Meet-URO Score Validation in Real-world Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Receiving First-line Pembrolizumab Plus axitinib

Giulia Airò

Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy; Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5196-8298
Annalisa Guida

Dipartimento di Oncologia, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria of Terni, Terni, Italy

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8520-7032
Alessio Gili

Department of Life Sciences, Health and Health Professions, Link Campus University Rome, Italy

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4359-5193
Alessio Signori

Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6289-9144
Sara Elena Rebuzzi

Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale San Paolo, Savona, Italy

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0546-6304
Marco Maruzzo

Oncologia 3, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6256-9249
Eleonora Lai

Oncologia 3, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy


Francesco Pierantoni

Oncologia 3, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8483-0196
Davide Bimbatti

Oncologia 1, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8177-5374
Umberto Basso

Oncologia 1, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5075-2177
Alessandra Damassi

SC Oncologia, Ospedale San Giacomo, Novi Ligure, Italy

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5052-0870
Fabio Calabrò

IRCCS National Cancer Institute Regina Elena Rome, Italy

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7863-3540
Linda Cerbone

Department of Oncology, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy


Claudia Caserta

SC Oncologia Medica, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria della Misericordia, Perugia, Italy

https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3721-4520
Grazia Sirgiovanni

Dipartimento di Oncologia, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria of Terni, Terni, Italy

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9150-2134
Debora Serafin

Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Santa Chiara Hospital, Pisa, Italy


Orazio Caffo

Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Oncology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7968-2531
Sarah Scagliarini

Department of Oncology, AORN Cardarelli, Naples, Italy

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5814-2296
Sergio Bracarda

Dipartimento di Oncologia, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria of Terni, Terni, Italy

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0703-2959
Sebastiano Buti

Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy; Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0876-0226
Keywords

Immunotherapy, Prognostic factors, Prognostic score, Renal Cell Carcinoma, Tyrosine kinase inhibitor

Abstract

The Meet-URO score provided a more accurate prognostication than the international metastatic RCC database consortium (IMDC) risk group classification for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) by incorporating the pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the presence of bone metastases in different settings of the disease. To additionally validate the Meet-URO score on overall survival (OS) in a cohort of mRCC patients treated with first-line pembrolizumab plus axitinib, a post hoc analysis of the observational prospective ProPAXI study was conducted. Progression-free survival (PFS) was also considered. Harrell’s C-index was used to compare the discriminative ability on OS and PFS. Overall, the ProPAXI study included 170 patients. Both the five- and the three-risk group Meet-URO score were evaluated to account for the small sample size. The five Meet-URO risk group score showed a mOS of 27.1 months (p = 0.064) and 10.3 (p = 0.014) months for group 4 and group 5, respectively, while it was not reached for the other groups (p < 0.01). Although a worsening of PFS was observed with increasing the risk group, these differences were not statistically significant (p =0.19). Similar results were observed fot the three-risk group Meet-URO score. Both five and the three Meet-URO risk groups showed a better C-index for OS (0.69 and 0.66, respectively) compared to IMDC (0.62) and for PFS (0.60 and 0.59, respectively) compared to IMDC (0.56). These findings suggest that the Meet-URO score may provide more accurate prognostic stratification than IMDC alone in mRCC patients treated with first-line pembrolizumab and axitinib.

References

1. Rini BI, Plimack ER, Stus V, Gafanov R, Hawkins R, Nosov D, et al. Pembrolizumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2019;380:1116–27. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1816714
2. Motzer R, Alekseev B, Rha SY, Porta C, Eto M, Powles T, et al. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab or everolimus for advanced renal cell carcinoma. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2021;384:1289–300. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2035716
3. Choueiri TK, Powles T, Burotto M, Escudier B, Bourlon MT, Zurawski B, et al. Nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2021;384:829–41. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2026982
4. Heng DYC, Xie W, Regan MM, Warren MA, Golshayan AR, Sahi C, et al. Prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with vascular endothelial growth factor–targeted agents: results from a large, multicenter study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2009;27:5794–9. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.4809
5. Heng DY, Xie W, Regan MM, Harshman LC, Bjarnason GA, Vaishampayan UN, et al. External validation and comparison with other models of the international metastatic renal-cell carcinoma database consortium prognostic model: a population-based study. Lancet Oncology. 2013;14:141–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70559-4 6. Rizzo A, Mollica V, Santoni M, Rosellini M, Marchetti A, Ricci AD, et al. Comparative effectiveness of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors according to IMDC risk groups in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Immunotherapy 2021;13:783–93. https://doi.org/10.2217/imt-2021-0005
7. Powles T, Plimack ER, Soulières D, Waddell T, Stus V, Gafanov R, et al. Pembrolizumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib monotherapy as first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-426): extended follow-up from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol ogy. 2020;21:1563–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30436-8
8. Motzer RJ, Powles T, Burotto M, Escudier B, Bourlon MT, Shah AY, et al. Nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib in first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma (CheckMate 9ER): long-term follow-up results from an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncology. 2022;23:888–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00290-X
9. Choueiri TK, Eto M, Motzer R, De Giorgi U, Buchler T, Basappa NS, et al. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus sunitinib as first-line treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (CLEAR): extended follow-up from the phase 3, randomised, open-label study. Lancet Oncology. 2023;24:228–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00049-9
10. Lee D, Gittleman H, Weinstock C, Suzman D, Bloomquist E, Agrawal S, et al. A U.S. food and drug administration–pooled analysis of frontline combination treatment survival benefits by risk groups in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. European Urology. 2023;84:373–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2023.05.030
11. Roviello G, Molina-Cerrillo J, Massari F, Cerbone L, Fiala O, Fornarini G, et al. First-line immune-based combinations or sunitinib in favorable-risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a real-world retrospective comparison from the ARON-1 study. Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy. 2025;74:65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-024-03897-x
12. Rebuzzi SE, Fornarini G, Signori A, Rescigno P, Banna GL, Buti S. Banana-shaped survival curves of metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with first-line immune-combinations, not just a matter of “palateau.” Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics. 2024;20. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2024.2351669
13. Rebuzzi SE, Signori A, Banna GL, Maruzzo M, De Giorgi U, Pedrazzoli P, et al. Inflammatory indices and clinical factors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with nivolumab: the development of a novel prognostic score (Meet-URO 15 study). Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology 2021;13. https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359211019642
14. Rebuzzi SE, Cerbone L, Signori A, Santoni M, Murianni V, De Giorgi U, et al. Application of the Meet-URO score to metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with second- and third-line cabozantinib. Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology. 2022;14. https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359221079580
15. Rebuzzi SE, Signori A, Buti S, Banna GL, Murianni V, Damassi A, et al. Validation of the meet-URO score in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving first-line nivolumab and ipilimumab in the Italian expanded access program. 2022;7:100634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100634
16. Damassi A, Cremante M, Signori A, Rebuzzi SE, Fornarini G, Giudice GC, et al. Prognostic stratification by the meet-URO score in real-world older patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) receiving cabozantinib: a subanalysis of the prospective ZEBRA study (Meet-URO 9). Clinical Genitourinary Cancer. 2024;22:126–133.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2023.10.001
17. He S, Liu H, Chen J, Zeng H. Validation of the meet-URO score in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients receiving second or third-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors-immune checkpoint inhibitors combination therapy. Journal of Translational Medicine. 2024;22:232. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-024-05014-z
18. Rescigno P, Ghose A, Brown N, James L, Haywood S, Frazer S, et al. Meet-URO score update in metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving first-line immune-combinations, The Oncologist. 2025; 30(1, September). https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf248.041
19. Guida A, Gili A, Mosillo C, Maruzzo M, Lai E, Pierantoni F, et al. Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab plus axitinib combination for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in a real-world scenario: data from the prospective ProPAXI study. Clinical Genitourinary Cancer. 2024:102225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102225
20. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2009;42:377–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
21. Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O’Neal L, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2019;95:103208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208
22. Han X, Zhang Y, Shao Y. On comparing 2 correlated C indices with censored survival data. Statistics in Medicine. 2017;36:4041–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.7414
23. Rebuzzi SE, Fornarini G, Signori A, Buti S, Procopio G, De Giorgi U, et al. International multicenter real-world REGistry for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma—meet-URO 33 study (REGAL study). BMC Cancer. 2024;24:757. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-12319-1

Comments (0)

No login
gif