Anwar, S., Menekse, M., Guzey, S., & Bryan, L. A. (2022). The effectiveness of an integrated STEM curriculum unit on middle school students' life science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(7), 1204-1234. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21756

Article  Google Scholar 

Apedoe, X. S., Reynolds, B., Ellefson, M. R., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Bringing engineering design into high school science classrooms: the heating/cooling unit. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(5), 454-465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9114-6

Article  Google Scholar 

Arshad, A. Y. M., Halim, L., & Nasri, N. M. (2021). A systematic review: Issues in implementation of integrated STEM education. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(9), 1124–1133.

Google Scholar 

Aydoğan, B., & Çakıroğlu, J. (2022). The effects of engineering design-based instruction on 7th grade students’ nature of engineering views. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(1), 68-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09931-2

Article  Google Scholar 

Bozkurt, E. (2014). The effect of design based science instruction on science teacher candidates’ decision making skills, science process skills and perceptions about the process. Unpublished dissertation. Gazi University, Graduate School of Educational Sciences, Ankara.

Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032

Article  Google Scholar 

Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30-35.

Google Scholar 

Çavaş, B., Bulut, Ç., Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2013). Fen eğitimine mühendislik odaklı bir yaklaşım: ENGINEER projesi ve uygulamaları [An Engineering oriented approach in science education: ENGINEER Project and its applications]. Fen Bilimleri Öğretimi Dergisi, 1(1), 12-22.

Google Scholar 

Çavaş, P., Ayar, A., Bula Turuplu, S., & Gürcan, G. (2020). A study on the ssatus of STEM educatıon research in Turkey. Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of Education Faculty, 17(1), 823-854.

Google Scholar 

Christensen, R., Knezek, G., Tyler-Wood, T., & Gibson, D. (2014). Longitudinal analysis of cognitive constructs fostered by STEM activities for middle school students. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 6(2), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2014.06.008

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Google Scholar 

Dalton, R. (2021). Building STEM Interest, Awareness, and Readiness: The Future Is Now. In Rural America's Pathways to College and Career (pp. 211–236). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003080268-9

De Loof, H., Pauw, B., & Van Petegem, P. (2021). Engaging students with ıntegrated STEM education: a happy marriage or a failed engagement?. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20, 1291 - 1313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10159-0

Article  Google Scholar 

De Loof, H., Struyf, A., Boeve-de Pauw, & Van Petegem, P. (2021). Teachers’ motivating style and students’ motivation and engagement in STEM: the relationship between three key educational concepts. Research in Science Education 51, 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9830-3

Article  Google Scholar 

Doppelt, Y., Mehalik, M. M., Schunn, C. D., Silk, E. & Krysinski, D. (2008). Engagement and achievements: a case study of design-based learning in a science context. Journal of Technology Education, 19(2), 22-39.

Google Scholar 

Dwyer, E. E. (1993). Attitude scale construction: A review of the literature. Retrieved from ERIC database https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ed359201

Ekiz-Kiran, B., & Aydin-Gunbatar, S. (2021). Analysis of engineering elements of K-12 science standards in seven countries engaged in STEM education reform. Science & Education, 30(4), 849-882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00227-w

Article  Google Scholar 

Elliott, B., Oty, K., Mcarthur, J. & Clark, B. (2001). The effect of an interdisplinary algebra/science course on students’ problem-solving skills, critical thinking skills and attitudes toward mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 32 (6), 811-816. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390110053784

Article  Google Scholar 

Ercan, S. (2014). The usage of engineering practices in science education: Design based science learning. Unpublished doctoral thesis), Marmara University: Istanbul.

Eroğlu, S., & Bektaş, O. (2016). Ideas of science teachers took STEM education about STEM based activities. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 4(3), 43-67.

Article  Google Scholar 

Fatihatur Roisah, L., Hamimi, E., Yulianti, E., Fardhani, I., & Mulyati, Y. (2025). The influence of design thinking learning with STEM approach on problem solving skills in motion and force topics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 3148, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/3148/1/012018

Fortus, D., Dershimer, R. C., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2004). Design-based science and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10). 1081-1110. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20040

Article  Google Scholar 

Freeman, K. E., Alston, S. T., & Winborne, D. G. (2008). Do learning communities enhance the quality of students' learning and motivation in STEM?. The Journal of Negro Education, 77(3), 227-240.

Google Scholar 

Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2017). Introduction to the T Statistic. In F. J. Gravetter, L. B., Wallnau, L.-A. B. Forzano (Eds.), Essentials of Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Wadsworth.

Gülhan, F., & Şahin, F. (2016). Fen-teknoloji-mühendislik-matematik entegrasyonunun (STEM) 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin kavramsal anlamalarına ve mesleklerle ilgili görüşlerine etkisi [The effect of the integration of Science-Technology-Engineering-Math (STEM) on 5th grade students’ conceptual understanding and their views about occupations]. In Ö. Demirel, & S. Dinçer (Eds.), Eğitimde nitelikler arayışı [Search for qualifications in education] (pp. 283–302). Pegem Yayınları: Ankara.

Guzey, S. S., Tank, K., Wang, H. H., Roehrig, G., & Moore, T. (2014). A high‐quality professional development for teachers of grades 3–6 for implementing engineering into classrooms. School Science and Mathematics, 114(3), 139-149. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12061

Article  Google Scholar 

Guzey, S. S., Moore, T. J., Harwell, M., & Moreno, M. (2016). STEM integration in middle school life science: Student learning and attitudes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(4), 550-560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9612-x

Article  Google Scholar 

Guzey, S., Harwell, M., Moreno, M., Peralta, Y., & Moore, T. (2017). The impact of design-based STEM integration curricula on student achievement in engineering, Science, and Mathematics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26, 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10956-016-9673-X

Article  Google Scholar 

Guzey, S., Ring‐Whalen, E., Harwell, M., & Peralta, Y. (2019). Life STEM: A case study of life science learning through engineering design. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, 23-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10763-017-9860-0.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hynes, M., Portsmore, M., Dare, E., Milto, E., Rogers, C., & Hammer, D. (2011). Infusing engineering design into high school STEM courses. Publications. Paper 165. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED537364.pdf

Ing, M., & Nylund-Gibson, K. (2017). The ımportance of early attitudes toward mathematics and science. Teachers College Record, 119(5), 1- 32. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811711900507

Article  Google Scholar 

Karahan, E., Canbazoglu Bilici, S., & Unal, A. (2015). Integration of media design processes in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 60, 221–240. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2015.60.15

Kıran, D., Sungur, S., & Yerdelen, S. (2019). Predicting science engagement with motivation and teacher characteristics: A multilevel investigation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, 67-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9882-2

Article  Google Scholar 

Koyunlu Ünlü, Z., & Dökme, İ. (2020). Multivariate assessment of middle school students’ interest in STEM career: a profile from Turkey. Research in Science Education, 50, 1217-1231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9729-4

Article  Google Scholar 

Kozan, K., Caskurlu, S., & Guzey, S. (2023). Factors influencing student outcomes in K-12 integrated STEM education: A systematic review. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 13(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1315

Lee, M & Erdogan, I. (2007). The Effect of Science Technology Society Teaching on Students’ Attitude toward Science and Certain Aspects of Creativity. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1315-1327. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600972974

Article  Google Scholar 

Leonard, M. J. (2004, April). Toward epistemologically authentic engineering design activities in the science classroom. Paper presented at National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Vancouver, B.C. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED522246.pdf

Lie, R., Guzey, S., & Moore, T. J. (2019). Implementing engineering in diverse upper elementary and middle school science classrooms: Student learning and attitudes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(2), 104-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9751-3

Article  Google Scholar 

Maker, C. J., Zimmerman, R., Gomez-Arizaga, M. P., Pease, R., & Burke, E. M. (2015). Developing real-life problem solving. In: Vidergor, H. E., Harris, C. R. (eds) Applied Practice for Educators of Gifted and Able Learners. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-004-8_8

Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among US students. Science Education, 95(5), 877-907. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20441

Article  Google Scholar 

Mann, E. L., Mann, R. L., Strutz, M. L., Duncan, D., & Yoon, S. Y. (2011). Integrating engineering into K-6 curriculum: Developing talent in the STEM disciplines. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22(4), 639-658. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X11415007

Article  Google Scholar 

Marulcu, I. (2010). Investigating the impact of a lego-based, engineering-oriented curriculum compared to an inquiry-based curriculum on fifth graders’ content learning of simple machines. Doctoral dissertation, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.

Massachusetts Department of Education (2006). Massachusetts science and technology/engineering curriculum framework. Malden, MA: Massachusetts Department of Education.

Mau, W., & Li, J. (2018). Factors influencing STEM career aspirations of underrepresented high school students. The Career Development Quarterly, 66(3), 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12146

Article  Google Scholar 

McMahon, M. M. & Showers, T. T. (2012). Partnering for success in the 21st century. In C. P. Veenstra, F. F. Padro, & J. A. Furst-Bowe (Eds.), Advancing the STEM Agenda: Quality Improvement Supports STEM. (pp. 29-55). Milwaukee, WI: ASQ Quality Press

Google Scholar 

Mehalik, M. M., Doppelt, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Middle school science through design-based learning versus scripted inquiry: Better overall science concept learning and equity gap reduction. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(1), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00955.x

Article  Google Scholar 

MoNE [Ministry of National Education] (2018). Science Curriculum (Elementary and Middle School 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th grades). Board of Education, Ankara.

MoNE (2021), Inservice teacher training plans. https://oygm.meb.gov.tr/www/hizmetici-egitim-planlari/icerik/28

Myers, D. G. (1993). Social Psychology (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Google Scholar 

Nathan, M. J., Phelps, L. A., & Atwood, A. K. (2011). STEM integration in a precollege course in digital electronics: Analysis of the enacted curriculum. Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) 2011.

National Academy of Engineering [NAE] & National Research Council [NRC] (2009). Engineering in K-12 education understanding the status and improving the prospects. National Academies Press, Washington.

Google Scholar 

National Research Council [NRC]. (2012). A Framework for k-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academic Press, Washington.

Google Scholar 

Nguyện, L. C., Hoa, H. Q., & Hien, L. H. P. (2025). Integrating design thinking into STEM education: Enhancing problem-solving skills of high school students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(4), em2611. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16084

Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. McGraw-hill Education: UK.

Papert, S. & Harel, I. (1991). Situating constructionism. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism. http://www.papert.org/articles/SituatingConstructionism.html

Pekbay, C. (2017). Effects of science technology engineering and mathematics activities on middle school students. Unpublished dissertation. Hacettepe University. Graduate School of Educational Sciences, Ankara.

Peterson, B. (2018). Applying curriculum treatments to improve STEM attitudes and promote STEM career interest in fifth graders. Unpublished dissertation. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

Prevost, A., Nathan, M. J., Stein, B., Tran, N., & Phelps, L. A. (2009). Integration of mathematics in pre-college engineering: The search for explicit connections. Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) 2009, 2009–1790.

Google Scholar 

Riegle‐Crumb, C., Moore, C., & Ramos‐Wada, A. (2011). Who wants to have a career in science or math? Exploring adolescents' future aspirations by gender and race/ethnicity. Science Education, 95(3), 458–476. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20431