Rosier PFWM, Gammie A, Valdevenito JP, Speich J, Smith P, Sinha S, et al. ICS-SUFU standard: Theory, terms, and recommendations for pressure-flow studies performance, analysis, and reporting. Part 2: Analysis of PFS, reporting, and diagnosis. Neurourol Urodyn. 2023;42(8):1603–27.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

StatPearls. 2026.

Huang J, Chan CK, Yee S, Deng Y, Bai Y, Chan SC, et al. Global burden and temporal trends of lower urinary tract symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023;26(2):421–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rosier PFWM, Valdevenito JP, Smith P, Sinha S, Speich J, Gammie A, et al. ICS-SUFU standard: Theory, terms, and recommendations for pressure-flow studies performance, analysis, and reporting. Part 1: Background theory and practice. Neurourol Urodyn. 2023;42(8):1590–602.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Abelson B, Majerus S, Sun D, Gill BC, Versi E, Damaser MS. Ambulatory urodynamic monitoring: state of the art and future directions. Nat Rev Urol. 2019;16(5):291–301.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Digesu GA, Gargasole C, Hendricken C, Gore M, Kocjancic E, Khullar V, et al. ICS teaching module: Ambulatory urodynamic monitoring. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36(2):364–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yanagi T, Kanematsu A, Shimatani K, Yamamoto S. Uroflowmetry is a viable surrogate for urethroscopy in evaluation of anatomical success following urethroplasty. Int J Urol. 2023;30(4):390–4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sinha S. The Use of Uroflowmetry as a Diagnostic Test. Curr Urol Rep. 2024;25(5):99–107.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rickey LM, Mueller ER, Newman DK, Markland AD, Falke C, Rudser K, et al. Reliability of Uroflowmetry Pattern Interpretation in Adult Women. Neurourol Urodyn. 2024;43(8):2084–92.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wada N, Watanabe M, Ishikawa M, Takeuchi K, Miyauchi K, Abe N, et al. Uroflowmetry pattern in detrusor underactivity and bladder outlet obstruction in male patients with lower urinary tract symptoms. Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2021;13(3):361–5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ben Muvhar R, Wagmaister J, Mekayten M. Navigating the Diagnostic Maze: Unraveling the Non-invasive Evaluation of Bladder Outlet Obstruction in Men—a Comprehensive Systematic Review. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep. 2023;18(4):318–32.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ito Y, Unagami M, Yamabe F, Mitsui Y, Nakajima K, Nagao K, et al. A method for utilizing automated machine learning for histopathological classification of testis based on Johnsen scores. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):9962.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Susset J. development of nomograms for application of uroflowmetry. In: Hinman F, Boyarski, editors. Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy. New York: Springer-; 1983. pp. 528–38.

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Netto JMB, Hittelman A, Lambert S, Murphy K, Collette-Gardere T, Franco I. Interpretation of uroflow curves: A global survey measuring inter and intra rater reliability. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020;39(2):826–32.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nitti VW. Pressure flow urodynamic studies: the gold standard for diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction. Rev Urol. 2005;7(Suppl 6):S14–21.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Matsukawa Y, Kameya Y, Takahashi T, Shimazu A, Ishida S, Yamada M, et al. Characteristics of uroflowmetry patterns in men with detrusor underactivity revealed by artificial intelligence. Int J Urol. 2023;30(10):907–12.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Taniguchi H, Kiyota S, Takizawa N, Kinoshita H. Uroflowmetry Parameters in Patients Undergoing Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation. Adv Urol. 2025;2025:9995075.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Al Adl AM, Omar RG, Mohey A, El Mogy AAEN, El Karamany TM. Chronological Changes In Uroflowmetry After Hypospadias Repair: An Observational Study. Res Rep Urol. 2019;11:269–76.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ru W, Liu H, Zhou J, Hu Q, Yang W, Hu L, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Uroflowmetry for Urethral Strictures in Pediatric Hypospadias: TIP versus Non-TIP Outcomes. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2025;35(4):309–15.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lambert E, Denys MA, Poelaert F, Everaert K, Lumen N. Validated uroflowmetry-based predictive model for the primary diagnosis of urethral stricture disease in men. Int J Urol. 2018;25(9):792–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Takeshima Y, Yamada Y, Takemura K, Kimura N, Hakozaki Y, Miyakawa J, et al. The association between the parameters of uroflowmetry and lower urinary tract symptoms in prostate cancer patients after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(10):e0275069.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sorel MR, Reitsma JB, Rosier PFWM, Bosch R, de Kort LM. Uroflowmetry in healthy women: A systematic review. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36(7):1954.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Haylen BT, Parys BT, Anyaegbunam WI, Ashby D, West CR. Urine flow rates in male and female urodynamic patients compared with the Liverpool nomograms. Br J Urol. 1990;65(5):483–7.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liu X, Meng L, Wang J, Ma T, Shi B, Huang H, et al. A multicenter uroflowmetry study of healthy women in China. Chin Med J (Engl). 2024;137(10):1225–7.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Abdool Z, Manana N, Becker P. A study to establish normal reference values of urine flow parameters in healthy South African females. South Afr J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;26(3)p1–5.

Taylor DL, Dueñas-Garcia OF, Maheshwari D, Sierra T, Leung K, Hall C, et al. Evaluation of Uroflowmetry Curve Patterns and Nomogram Construct in Healthy Nulliparous Female Adults. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2022;28(4):220–4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Elliott CS. Female Urethral Stricture Management: The Initial Experience of an Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery-Trained Urologist. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021;27(4):e516–20.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ma Y, Zhang Y, Ma C, Wang Y, Tian W, Zhu L. Clinical outcomes and uroflowmetry assessment in patients with apical prolapse after laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;259:12–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Escobar C, Brucker B. Urodynamics for the Failed Midurethral Sling. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep. 2020;15(4):245–58.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sharma N, Chakrabarti S. Clinical Evaluation of Urinary Incontinence. J Midlife Health. 2018;9(2):55–64.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Snyder JA, Lipsitz DU. Evaluation of female urinary incontinence. Urol Clin North Am. 1991;18(2):197–209.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Diokno AC, Normolle DP, Brown MB, Herzog AR. Urodynamic tests for female geriatric urinary incontinence. Urology. 1990;36(5):431–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jaekel AK, Rieger J, Butscher AL, Möhr S, Schindler O, Queissert F et al. Diagnoses and treatment recommendations-interrater reliability of uroflowmetry in people with multiple sclerosis. Biomedicines. 2024;12(7):1598.

Pandolfo SD, Crauso F, Aveta A, Cilio S, Barone B, Napolitano L et al. A novel low-cost uroflowmetry for patient telemonitoring. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(4):3287.

Kaplan SA, Molnar GC, Shen J, Eure GR. The Role of Remote Diagnostics to Better Assess Uroflow Variability: Insights From Combining at Home Uroflows and Frequency Volume Charts From 19,868 Voids Using a Novel, Hand Held, Cellular Embedded Device. Urology. 2024;190:71–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Harton GL, Munné S, Surrey M, Grifo J, Kaplan B, McCulloh DH, et al. Diminished effect of maternal age on implantation after preimplantation genetic diagnosis with array comparative genomic hybridization. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(6):1695–703.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Poulsen EU, Kirkeby HJ. Home-monitoring of uroflow in normal male adolescents. Relation between flow-curve, voided volume and time of day. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1988;114:58–62.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar