Rademacher N, Curwick LA, Parker CC. A brief history and the current state of robotic mastectomy: a review. Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2025;17(1):31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12609-025-00587-0.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Toesca A, Peradze N, Galimberti V, Manconi A, Intra M, Gentilini O, et al. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with implant: first report of surgical technique. Ann Surg. 2017;266(2):e28–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001397.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Houvenaeghel G, Bannier M, Rua S, Barrou J, Heinemann M, Van Troy A, et al. Breast cancer robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy: evaluation of several surgical procedures and learning curve. World J Surg Oncol. 2019;17:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1567-y.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ryu JM, Mok CW, Toesca A, Lai HW, Kuo WL, Cheng FT, et al. Consensus statement on robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy expert panel. J Breast Cancer. 2025;28(3):180–92. https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2025.0030.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Frey JD, Salibian AA, Karp NS, Choi M. The impact of mastectomy weight on reconstructive trends and outcomes in nipple-sparing mastectomy: progressively greater complications with larger breast size. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;141(6):e795–804. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004404.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Sae-Lim C, Lai HW, Lin SL, Huang HI, Chen ST, Chen DR. Is minimal-accessed (endoscopic- or robotic-assisted) nipple-sparing mastectomy contraindicated for large breasts? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024;50(4):108030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108030.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sarfati B, Struk S, Leymarie N, Honart JF, Alkhashnam H, Tran de Fremicourt K, et al. Robotic prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction: a prospective study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(9):2579–86. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6555-x.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gibson E, Farajzadeh MM, Salibian AA. Staged breast reduction or mastopexy before nipple-sparing mastectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2025;156(4):e461–71. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000012118.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Toesca A, Peradze N, Manconi A, Galimberti V, Intra M, Colleoni M, et al. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer: feasibility and safety study. Breast. 2017;31:51–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2016.10.009.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Angarita FA, Castelo M, Englesakis M, McCready DR, Cil TD. Robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy: systematic review. Br J Surg. 2020;107(12):1580–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11837.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Farr DE, Haddock NT, Tellez J, Radi I, Alterio R, Sayers B, et al. Safety and feasibility of single-port robotic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy. JAMA Surg. 2024;159(3):269–76. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2023.6999.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lee SB, Kim J, Chung IY, Ko BS, Son BH, Lee JW, et al. Use of the da Vinci SP surgical system in robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy: a single-center retrospective study. Sci Rep. 2025;15:12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-84807-0.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mok CW, Seet YLM, Lin ZC, Hing JJX, Seah JCM, Tan SM. Pilot robotic mastectomy in Singapore (PRoMiSing I) study: first safety and feasibility prospective cohort trial in South East Asia. Int J Surg. 2024;110(9):5463–70. https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000001674.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Choi JE, Lee YW, Gwark S, Paek SH, Chang YW, Choi HJ et al. Single-port robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy: main analysis of a retrospective multicenter study (SPROUT, KoREa-BSG 09). Ann Surg Oncol. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-026-19262-4. This multicenter study provides large-scale clinical evidence supporting the feasibility of single-port robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy, reporting no cases requiring conversion to open surgery.

Park HS, Lee J, Lai HW, Park JM, Ryu JM, Lee JE, et al. Surgical and oncologic outcomes of robotic and conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction: international multicenter pooled data analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022;29(11):6646–57. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-11865-x.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lin YM, Lui SA, Chen MY, Chou YY, Cheng FT. Safety and feasibility of robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate direct-to-implant reconstruction: insights from one of the largest centers in Asia. Clin Breast Cancer. 2025;25(3):277–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2024.12.013.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lai HW, Su J, Abdul Rauf NH, Lee YY, Chen ST, Chen DR. Long-term oncologic outcomes of minimal-access nipple-sparing mastectomy compared with conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy: a propensity score–matched analysis. Int J Surg. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000004569.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lai HW, Chen DR, Liu LC, Chen ST, Kuo YL, Lin SL, et al. Robotic versus conventional or endoscopic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate prosthesis breast reconstruction in the management of breast cancer: a prospectively designed multicenter trial comparing clinical outcomes, medical cost, and patient-reported outcomes (RCENSM-P). Ann Surg. 2024;279(1):138–46. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005924.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lin YC, Lui SA, Chen MY, Chou YY, Cheng FT. Safety and feasibility of robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate direct-to-implant reconstruction: insights from one of the largest centers in Asia. Clin Breast Cancer. 2025;25(3):277–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2024.12.013.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nessa A, Shaikh S, Fuller M, Masannat YA, Kastora SL. Postoperative complications and surgical outcomes of robotic versus conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: meta-analysis. Br J Surg. 2024;111(1):znad336. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znad336.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Maes-Carballo M, Gómez-Fandiño Y, Segovia Braña PM, Martínez-Martínez C, Alberca-Remigio C, Cámara-Martínez C, et al. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy: a comparative analysis with conventional and endoscopic techniques through a systematic review. J Robot Surg. 2025;19(1):220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02388-0.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Toesca A, Peradze N, Manconi A, Rietjens M, Luzzati A, Garusi C, et al. A randomized trial of robotic mastectomy versus open surgery in breast cancer: surgical and patient-reported outcomes. Ann Surg. 2022;276(1):17–24. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005397.

Article  Google Scholar 

You JY, Kim YM, Lee ES, Lee H, Jung SP. Comparison of surgical outcomes in robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy with conventional open nipple-sparing mastectomy: a single-center experience. J Clin Med. 2025;14(13):4608. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14134608.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Jung SM, Kim YJ, Lee KT, Jeon BJ, Mun GH, Pyon JK, et al. Learning curve for robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy: a single institution experience. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024;50(10):108602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108602.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lai HW, Chen ST, Lin SL, Chen CJ, Lin YL, Pai SH, et al. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with gel implant: technique, preliminary results and patient-reported cosmetic outcome. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(1):42–52. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6704-2.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Filipe MD, de Bock E, Postma EL, Bastian OW, Schellekens PPA, Vriens MR, et al. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy complication rate compared to traditional nipple-sparing mastectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Robot Surg. 2022;16(2):265–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-021-01265-w.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lee J, Park HS, Lee H, Lee DW, Song SY, Lew DH, et al. Post-operative complications and nipple necrosis rates between conventional and robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy. Front Oncol. 2021;10:594388. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.594388.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Elghazaly S, Fakeh S, Elbarbary S, Mahmoud K, Hilali AE, Gamal P, et al. Robot-assisted versus open surgery in early-stage breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Breast Cancer. 2026;26(2):181–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2025.08.019.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kuo WL, Huang JJ, Chu CH, Chang SC, Lin YJ, Chuang YH, et al. Comparative analysis of oncological and surgical outcomes of robotic versus conventional mastectomy for breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2025;51(5):109622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109622.

Article