Authors:

Ramin Nourinia[email protected]Ophthalmic Research Center, Research Institute for Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran

Seyed-Hossein Abtahi[email protected]Ophthalmic Research Center, Research Institute for Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran

Hosein Nouri[email protected]Ophthalmic Research Center, Research Institute for Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran

Amir Reza Mansouri[email protected]School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan

Abstract:

This study describes a novel technique for removing the internal limiting membrane (ILM) using a 25-G vitrectomy probe during the epiretinal membrane (ERM)/ILM double peeling procedure. After standard 3-port 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy, ERM is removed using membrane forceps and appropriate staining. An incidental ILM flap may occur while washing out the ILM-specific dye with the vitrectomy probe. To prevent this, we suggest not withdrawing the vitrectomy probe, but instead applying proximal and tangential aspiration force over the ILM flap, which may be extended and peeled off by gentle probe maneuvers along the retinal surface. The technique is described in three cases, with details, and shown in a video. This approach has several advantages. It may reduce the number of entries into the posterior segment during pars plana vitrectomy, preventing inadvertent retinal breaks. Furthermore, in cases with fragile ILMs that are hard to elongate with forceps, the active aspiration force of the vitrectomy probe might rapidly extend and form large flaps. We suggest applying this technique in scenarios involving ERM/ILM double peeling and double staining, where an incidental ILM flap is found after washing out the ILM-specific dye.

Keywords: Epiretinal Membrane, Internal Limiting Membrane, Probe, Surgery, Treatment, Vitrectomy

References:

1. Díaz-Valverde A, Wu L. To peel or not to peel the internal limiting membrane in idiopathic epiretinal membranes. Retina 2018;38:S5–S11.

2. Fung AT, Galvin J, Tran T. Epiretinal membrane: A review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2021;49:289-308.

3. Shimada H, Nakashizuka H, Hattori T, Mori R, Mizutani Y, Yuzawa M. Double staining with brilliant blue G and double peeling for epiretinal membranes. Ophthalmology 2009;116:1370-1376.

4. Azuma K, Ueta T, Eguchi S, Aihara M. Effects of internal limiting membrane peeling combined with removal of idiopathic epiretinal membrane: A systematic review of literature and meta-analysis. Retina 2017;37:1813-1819.

5. Rush RB, Simunovic MP, Aragon AV 2nd, Ysasaga JE. Postoperative macular hole formation after vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling for the treatment of epiretinal membrane. Retina 2014;34:890-896.

6. Asencio-Duran M, Manzano-Muñoz B, Vallejo-García JL, García-Martínez J. Complications of macular peeling. J Ophthalmol 2015;2015:467814.

7. Oh HN, Lee JE, Kim HW, Yun IH. Clinical outcomes of double staining and additional ILM peeling during ERM surgery. Korean J Ophthalmol 2013;27:256-260.