Boriani S (2018) En bloc resection in the spine: a procedure of surgical oncology. J Spine Surg 4:668–676. https://doi.org/10.21037/jss.2018.09.02

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kasapovic A, Bornemann R, Pflugmacher R, Rommelspacher Y (2021) Implants for vertebral body replacement - which systems are available and have become established. Z Orthop Unfall 159:83–90. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1017-3968

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Li Z, Guo L, Zhang P et al (2022) A systematic review of perioperative complications in en bloc resection for spinal tumors. Glob Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682221120644

Article  Google Scholar 

Li Z, Wei F, Liu Z et al (2020) Risk factors for instrumentation failure after total en bloc spondylectomy of thoracic and lumbar spine tumors using titanium mesh cage for anterior reconstruction. World Neurosurg 135:e106–e115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.11.057

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Berjano P, Cecchinato R, Pun A, Boriani S (2020) Revision surgery for tumors of the thoracic and lumbar spine: causes, prevention, and treatment strategy. Eur Spine J 29:66–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06276-8

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kolesov SV, Kazmin AI et al (2020) Cage subsidence after surgery on the anterior part of the subaxial cervical spine: a monocentric prospective clinical study with a 3-year follow-up. Traumatol Orthop Russia 26:139–147. https://doi.org/10.21823/2311-2905-2020-26-2-139-147

Article  Google Scholar 

Xu H, Wang X, Han Y et al (2022) Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic reconstructions in total en bloc spondylectomy: a finite element study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 23:955. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05919-0

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Costanzo R, Ferini G, Brunasso L et al (2022) The role of 3D-printed custom-made vertebral body implants in the treatment of spinal tumors: a systematic review. Life (Basel) 12:489. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12040489

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kotrych D, Angelini A, Bohatyrewicz A, Ruggieri P (2023) 3D printing for patient-specific implants in musculoskeletal oncology. EFORT Open Rev 8:331–339. https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-23-0066

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kumar N, Ramakrishnan SA, Lopez KG et al (2021) Can polyether ether ketone dethrone titanium as the choice implant material for metastatic spine tumor surgery? World Neurosurg 148:94–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.01.059

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rendas P, Figueiredo L, Machado C et al (2023) Mechanical performance and bioactivation of 3D-printed PEEK for high-performance implant manufacture: a review. Prog Biomater 12:89–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40204-022-00214-6

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zaborovskii N, Masevnin S, Smekalenkov O et al (2025) Patient-specific 3D-printed PEEK implants for spinal tumor surgery. J Orthop 62:99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2024.10.024

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Honigmann P, Sharma N, Schumacher R et al (2021) In-hospital 3D printed scaphoid prosthesis using medical-grade Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) biomaterial. BioMed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1301028

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hu J, Song G, Chen H et al (2023) Surgical outcomes and risk factors for surgical complications after en bloc resection following reconstruction with 3D-printed artificial vertebral body for thoracolumbar tumors. World J Surg Oncol 21:385. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03271-8

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zaborovskii NS, Shailieva SL, Masevnin SV et al (2025) Subsidence of vertebral body replacement prostheses in spinal tumors: a systematic review. Traumatol Ortop Ross 31:179–188. https://doi.org/10.17816/2311-2905-17750

Article  Google Scholar 

Yoshioka K, Murakami H, Demura S et al (2017) Risk factors of instrumentation failure after multilevel total en bloc spondylectomy. Spine Surg Relat Res 1:31–39. https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.1.2016-0005

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chen Z, Lü G, Wang X et al (2023) Is 3D-printed prosthesis stable and economic enough for anterior spinal column reconstruction after spinal tumor resection? A retrospective comparative study between 3D-printed off-the-shelf prosthesis and titanium mesh cage. Eur Spine J 32:261–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07480-9

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shimizu T, Kato S, Demura S et al (2023) Characteristics and risk factors of instrumentation failure following total en bloc spondylectomy. Bone Joint J 105-B:172–179. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.105B2.BJJ-2022-0761.R2

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shen FH, Gasbarrini A, Lui DF et al (2022) Integrated custom composite Polyetheretherketone/Carbon fiber (PEEK/CF) vertebral body replacement (VBR) in the treatment of bone tumors of the spine: a preliminary report from a multicenter study. Spine 47:252. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004177

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hu X, Kenan S, Cheng M et al (2022) 3D-printed patient-customized artificial vertebral body for spinal reconstruction after total en bloc spondylectomy of complex multi-level spinal tumors. Int J Bioprint 8:576. https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v8i3.576

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Dong M, Gao Y, Fan H et al (2024) Comparison of clinical efficacy of 3D-printed artificial vertebral body and conventional titanium mesh cage in spinal reconstruction after total en bloc spondylectomy for spinal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1327319

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pokorni AJ, Turbucz M, Kiss RM et al (2023) Comparison of anterior column reconstruction techniques after en bloc spondylectomy: a finite element study - Scientific Reports. Sci Rep 13:18767. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45736-6

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Warburton A, Girdler SJ, Mikhail CM et al (2020) Biomaterials in spinal implants: a review. Neurospine 17:101–110. https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.1938296.148

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Heary RF, Parvathreddy N, Sampath S, Agarwal N (2017) Elastic modulus in the selection of interbody implants. J Spine Surg 3:163–167. https://doi.org/10.21037/jss.2017.05.01

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Frost HM (2004) A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff’s law for clinicians. Angle Orthod 74:3–15. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074%3c0003:AUOBPA%3e2.0.CO;2

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shosheva O, Zhmaylo M, Maslov L et al (2025) Comparative analysis of lumbar spine reconstruction using implants made of homogeneous PEEK and lattice titanium. Russ J Biomech 29:53–73. https://doi.org/10.15593/RJBiomech/2025.1.04

Article  Google Scholar 

Kumar N, Kumar P, Zihui GL et al (2024) Nonmetallic carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone implants vs titanium implants: analysis of clinical outcomes and influence on postoperative radiotherapy planning in metastatic spine tumor surgery. Int J Spine Surg 18:603–610. https://doi.org/10.14444/8685

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ward J, Damante M, Wilson S et al (2025) Impact of instrumentation material on local recurrence: a case-matched series using carbon fiber-PEEK vs. titanium. J Neurooncol 171:155–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-024-04842-9

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhou H, Liu S, Li Z et al (2022) 3D-printed vertebral body for anterior spinal reconstruction in patients with thoracolumbar spinal tumors. J Neurosurg Spine 37:274–282. https://doi.org/10.3171/2022.1.SPINE21900

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Demyashkin G, Durasov M, Muraev A et al (2025) Assessment of local tissue responses to subcutaneous implantation of Polyetheretherketone and Polymethyl methacrylate-based materials. Scr Med 56:439–449. https://doi.org/10.5937/scriptamed56-59057