Aseptic glenoid baseplate loosening after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with a lateralized convex baseplate: helical blade versus central peg fixation

Boileau P, Watkinson D, Hatzidakis AM, Hovorka I (2006) Neer award 2005: the Grammont reverse shoulder prosthesis: results in cuff tear arthritis, fracture sequelae, and revision arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15:527–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2006.01.003

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dillon MT, Chan PH, Inacio MCS et al (2017) Yearly trends in elective shoulder arthroplasty, 2005–2013. Arthritis Care Res 69:1574–1581. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.23167

Article  Google Scholar 

Gutiérrez S, Levy JC, Frankle MA et al (2008) Evaluation of abduction range of motion and avoidance of inferior scapular impingement in a reverse shoulder model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17:608–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.11.010

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Werner BC, Lederman E, Gobezie R, Denard PJ (2021) Glenoid lateralization influences active internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 30:2498–2505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2021.02.021

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Harman M, Frankle M, Vasey M, Banks S (2005) Initial glenoid component fixation in “reverse” total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical evaluation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14:S162–S167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2004.09.030

Article  Google Scholar 

Zilber S, Camana E, Lapner P et al (2018) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using helical blade to optimize glenoid fixation and bone preservation: preliminary results in thirty five patients with minimum two year follow-up. Int Orthop (SICOT) 42:2159–2164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3891-1

Article  Google Scholar 

James J, Huffman KR, Werner FW et al (2012) Does glenoid baseplate geometry affect its fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty? J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21:917–924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.04.017

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Werthel J-D, Walch G, Vegehan E et al (2019) Lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a descriptive analysis of different implants in current practice. Int Orthop 43:2349–2360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-019-04365-3

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Constant CR, Gerber C, Emery RJH et al (2008) A review of the Constant score: modifications and guidelines for its use. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17:355–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.06.022

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gilbart MK, Gerber C (2007) Comparison of the subjective shoulder value and the Constant score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16:717–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.02.123

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Boileau P, Gauci M-O, Wagner ER et al (2019) The reverse shoulder arthroplasty angle: a new measurement of glenoid inclination for reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 28:1281–1290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.11.074

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hamada K, Fukuda H, Mikasa M, Kobayashi Y (1990) Roentgenographic findings in massive rotator cuff tears. A long-term observation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199005000-00014

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Friedman RJ, Hawthorne KB, Genez BM (1992) The use of computerized tomography in the measurement of glenoid version. J Bone Joint Surg Am. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199274070-00009

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bercik MJ, Kruse K, Yalizis M et al (2016) A modification to the Walch classification of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis using three-dimensional imaging. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 25:1601–1606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.03.010

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Boileau P, Morin-Salvo N, Bessière C et al (2020) Bony increased-offset–reverse shoulder arthroplasty: 5 to 10 years’ follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 29:2111–2122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2020.02.008

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Boutsiadis A, Lenoir H, Denard PJ et al (2018) The lateralization and distalization shoulder angles are important determinants of clinical outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 27:1226–1234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.02.036

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Melis B, DeFranco M, Lädermann A et al (2011) An evaluation of the radiological changes around the Grammont reverse geometry shoulder arthroplasty after eight to 12 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93-B:1240–1246. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.93B9.25926

Article  Google Scholar 

Sirveaux F, Favard L, Oudet D et al (2004) Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:388–395. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.86B3.14024

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Klein A, Nové-Josserand L, Collotte P, Gunst S (2025) Incidence and risk factors for aseptic glenoid baseplate loosening in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty using the Aramis implant baseplate with a minimum of 2 years follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2025.07.030

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhou A, Xu S, Yew KSA, Lie DTT (2023) Minimal clinically important differences for Oxford, Constant, and University of California Los Angeles shoulder scores after reverse shoulder arthroplasty to allow interpretation of patient-reported outcome measures and future statistical power analyses. Arthroscopy 39:1405–1414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2022.12.027

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Simovitch R, Flurin P-H, Wright T et al (2018) Quantifying success after total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important difference. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 27:298–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.09.013

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hao KA, Hones KM, O’Keefe DS et al (2023) Quantifying success after first revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 32:e516–e527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2023.03.032

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Comments (0)

No login
gif