Papier A, Peres MR, Bobrow M, Bhatia A. The digital imaging system and dermatology. Int J Dermatol. 2000;39(8):561–75.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ratner D, Thomas CO, Bickers D. The uses of digital photography in dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;41(5):749–56.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Oloruntoba AI, Asghari‐Jafarabadi M, Sashindranath M, Ingvar Å, Adler NR, Vico‐Alonso C, et al. Assessment of image quality on the diagnostic performance of clinicians and deep learning models: cross‐sectional comparative reader study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.20462.

Maier K, Zaniolo L, Marques O. Image quality issues in teledermatology: a comparative analysis of artificial intelligence solutions. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;87(1):240–2.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wallace MM, Hackstadt AJ, Zhao Z, Patrinely JR, Zic J, Ellis D, et al. The teledermatology experience: cost savings and image quality control. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2024;30(5):1411–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Weingast J, Scheibböck C, Wurm EMT, Ranharter E, Porkert S, Dreiseitl S, et al. A prospective study of mobile phones for dermatology in a clinical setting. J Telemed Telecare. 2013;19(4):213–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Romero Aguilera G, de la Cortina P, Vera Iglesias E, Sánchez Caminero P, García Arpa M, Garrido Martín JA. Interobserver reliability of store-and-forward teledermatology in a clinical practice setting. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2014;105(6):605–13.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

*, Vodrahalli K, Ko J, Chiou AS, Novoa R, Abid A, Phung M et al. Development and Clinical Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence Support Tool for Improving Telemedicine Photo Quality. JAMA Dermatol. 2023;159(5):496. *TrueImage CNN decreased poor-quality submissions, showing realtime feedback can help address image quality defects in real world practice.

*, Jiang SW, Flynn MS, Kwock JT, Nicholas MW. Store-and-Forward Images in Teledermatology: Narrative Literature Review. JMIR Dermatol. 2022;5(3):e37517. *Half of patient-submitted images were found diagnostically unusable, demonstrating need for automated DIQA.

Eedy DJ, Wootton R. Teledermatology: a review. Br J Dermatol. 2001;144(4):696–707.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Borre ED, Nicholas MW. The disproportionate burden of electronic health record messages with image attachments in dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;86(2):492–4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lytvyn Y, Sachdeva M, Mufti A, Yeung J. Dermatology: how to manage psoriasis and recognize differences in pathophysiology and presentation in patients with skin of colour. Drugs Context. 2022;11:2021–9.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Krupinski EA, LeSueur B, Ellsworth L, Levine N, Hansen R, Silvis N, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and image quality using a digital camera for teledermatology. Telemedicine Journal. 1999;5(3):257–63.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dahlén Gyllencreutz J, Johansson Backman E, Terstappen K, Paoli J. Teledermoscopy images acquired in primary health care and hospital settings - a comparative study of image quality. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32(6):1038–43.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cummins MR, Ong T, Ivanova J, Barrera JF, Wilczewski H, Soni H, et al. Consensus guidelines for teledermatology: scoping review. JMIR Dermatol. 2023;6:e46121.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

McKoy K, Antoniotti NM, Armstrong A, Bashshur R, Bernard J, Bernstein D, et al. Practice guidelines for teledermatology. Telemed e-Health. 2016;22(12):981–90.

Article  Google Scholar 

Quality Standards for Teledermatology Using. Store and Forward Images [Internet]. British Association of Dermatologists; 2013 [cited 2025 Apr 14]. Available from: https://cdn.bad.org.uk/uploads/2022/02/29200021/Teledermatology-Quality-Standards.pdf

Quigley EA, Tokay BA, Jewell ST, Marchetti MA, Halpern AC. Technology and technique standards for camera-acquired digital dermatologic images: a systematic review. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151(8):883.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jeong HK, Park C, Jiang SW, Nicholas M, Chen S, Henao R, et al. Image quality assessment using convolutional neural network in clinical skin images. JID Innov. 2024;4(4):100285.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Jalaboi R, Winther O, Galimzianova A. Explainable image quality assessments in teledermatological photography. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2023;29(9):1342–8.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Subudhi S, Verma A, Patel AB, Hardin CC, Khandekar MJ, Lee H, et al. Comparing machine learning algorithms for predicting ICU admission and mortality in COVID-19. NPJ Digit Med. 2021;4(1):87.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Jiang SW, Flynn MS, Kwock JT, Liu B, Quow K, Blanchard SK, et al. Quality and perceived usefulness of patient-submitted store-and-forward teledermatology images. JAMA Dermatol. 2022;158(10):1183.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sun MD, Kentley J, Wilson BW, Soyer HP, Curiel-Lewandrowski CN, Rotemberg V, et al. Digital skin imaging applications, part I: assessment of image acquisition technique features. Skin Res Technol. 2022;28(4):623–32.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

*, Ribeiro RDPES, Von Wangenheim A. Automated image quality and protocol adherence assessment of examinations in teledermatology: first results. Telemed E-Health. 2024;30(4):994–1005. *Showed CNN + DensePose matched dermatologists’ ratings of image quality (Krippendorff alpha of 0.97).

Article  Google Scholar 

Jeong HK, Henao R, Park C, Jiang S, Nicholas M, Chen S, et al. Image quality assessment using a convolutional neural network for clinical skin images. Iproceedings. 2023;9:e49534.

Article  Google Scholar 

Goceri E. Evaluation of denoising techniques to remove speckle and Gaussian noise from dermoscopy images. Comput Biol Med. 2023;152:106474.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bozorgpour A, Sadegheih Y, Kazerouni A, Azad R, Merhof D, DermoSegDiff: arXiv. 2023 [cited 2025 Apr 17]. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.02959

Kasmi R, Hagerty J, Young R, Lama N, Nepal J, Miinch J, et al. Sharpreazor: automatic removal of hair and ruler marks from dermoscopy images. Skin Res Technol. 2023;29(4):e13203.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

*, Han SS, Navarrete-Dechent C, Liopyris K, Kim MS, Park GH, Woo SS, et al. The degradation of performance of a state-of-the-art skin image classifier when applied to patient-driven internet search. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):16260. *Showed that ML classification declined on patient-sourced images, suggesting lower protocol adherence degrades AI performance.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hernández Montilla I, Mac Carthy T, Aguilar A, Medela A. Dermatology image quality assessment (DIQA): artificial intelligence to ensure the clinical utility of images for remote consultations and clinical trials. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023;88(4):927–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Osibote OA, Dendere R, Krishnan S, Douglas TS. Automated focusing in bright-field microscopy for tuberculosis detection. J Microsc. 2010;240(2):155–63.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Vasconcelos MJM, Rosado L. No-reference Blur Assessment of Dermatological Images Acquired via Mobile Devices. In: Elmoataz A, Lezoray O, Nouboud F, Mammass D, editors. Image and Signal Processing [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2014 [cited 2025 Apr 14]. pp. 350–7. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science; vol. 8509). Available from: http://link.springer.com/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07998-1_40

Ray A, Sarkar S, Schwenker F, Sarkar R. Decoding skin cancer classification: perspectives, insights, and advances through researchers’ lens. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):30542.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Tan TY, Zhang L, Jiang M. An intelligent decision support system for skin cancer detection from dermoscopic images. In: 2016 12th International Conference on Natural Computation, Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (ICNC-FSKD) [Internet]. Changsha, China: IEEE; 2016 [cited 2025 Apr 14]. pp. 2194–9. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7603521/

Javaid A, Sadiq M, Akram F. Skin Cancer Classification Using Image Processing and Machine Learning. In: 2021 International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences and Technologies (IBCAST) [Internet]. Islamabad, Pakistan: IEEE; 2021 [cited 2025 Apr 14]. pp. 439–44. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9393198/

Khan R, Hanbury A, Stoettinger J. Skin detection: A random forest approach. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing [Internet]. Hong Kong, Hong Kong: IEEE; 2010 [cited 2025 Feb 4]. pp. 4613–6. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5651638/

Lecun Y, Bottou L, Bengio Y, Haffner P. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proc IEEE. 1998;86(11):2278–324.

Article  Google Scholar 

Murphree DH, Puri P, Shamim H, Bezalel SA, Drage LA, Wang M, et al. Deep learning for dermatologists: part I. Fundamental concepts. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;87(6):1343–51.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kose K, Bozkurt A, Alessi-Fox C, Brooks DH, Dy JG, Rajadhyaksha M, et al. Utilizing machine learning for image quality assessment for reflectance confocal microscopy. J Invest Dermatol. 2020;140(6):1214–22.

Article  CAS  PubMed