Vano E, Gonzalez L, Guibelalde E, Fernandez J, Ten J. Radiation exposure to medical staff in interventional and cardiac radiology. Br J Radiol. 1998;71(849):954–60. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.71.849.10195011.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Biso SMR, Vidovich MI. Radiation protection in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. J Thorac Dis. 2020;12(4):1648. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2019.12.86.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chida K, Kato M, Kagaya Y, Zuguchi M, Saito H, Ishibashi T, et al. Radiation dose and radiation protection for patients and physicians during interventional procedure. J Radiat Res. 2010;51(2):97–105. https://doi.org/10.1269/jrr.09112.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vano E, Kleiman NJ, Duran A, Romano-Miller M, Rehani MM. Radiation-associated lens opacities in catheterization personnel: results of a survey and direct assessments. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24(2):197–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2012.10.016.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ciraj-Bjelac O, Rehani MM, Sim KH, Liew HB, Vano E, Kleiman NJ. Risk for radiation-induced cataract for staff in interventional cardiology: is there reason for concern? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;76(6):826–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.22670.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Clairand I, Bordy J-M, Carinou E, Daures J, Debroas J, Denozière M, et al. Use of active personal dosemeters in interventional radiology and cardiology: tests in laboratory conditions and recommendations-oramed project. Radiat Meas. 2011;46(11):1252–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.07.008.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Yamada A, Haga Y, Sota M, Abe M, Kaga Y, Inaba Y, et al. Eye lens radiation dose to nurses during cardiac interventional radiology: an initial study. Diagnostics. 2023;13(18):3003. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13183003.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Li M, Fan S, Zhang X, Hao S, Zhao Y, Deng J, et al. Assessment of occupational exposure to eye lens dosimetry for interventional radiology workers in china during 2017–2019. Health Phys. 2022;123(3):229–37. https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000001590.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bordier C, Klausz R, Desponds L. Patient dose map indications on interventional x-ray systems and validation with gafchromic xr-rv3 film. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2015;163(3):306–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncu181.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Colombo PE, Rottoli F, Felisi M, De Mattia C, Riga S, Sutto M, et al. Validation of a dose tracking software for skin dose map calculation in interventional radiology. Phys Med. 2020;72:122–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.03.008.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schuetze K, Kraus M, Eickhoff A, Gebhard F, Richter PH. Radiation exposure for intraoperative 3d scans in a hybrid operating room: how to reduce radiation exposure for the surgical team. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018;13(8):1291–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-018-1747-1.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bozkurt A, Bor D. Simultaneous determination of equivalent dose to organs and tissues of the patient and of the physician in interventional radiology using the monte carlo method. Phys Med Biol. 2006;52(2):317. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/52/2/001.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Santos WS, Neves LP, Perini AP, Belinato W, Caldas LV, Carvalho AB Jr, et al. Exposures in interventional radiology using Monte Carlo simulation coupled with virtual anthropomorphic phantoms. Phys Med. 2015;31(8):929–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.06.011.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

O’Connor U, Walsh C, Gorman D, O’Reilly G, Martin Z, Madhavan P, et al. Feasibility study of computational occupational dosimetry: evaluating a proof-of-concept in an endovascular and interventional cardiology setting. J Radiol Prot. 2022;42(4):041501. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ac9394.

Article  Google Scholar 

Fan J, Xing L, Dong P, Wang J, Hu W, Yang Y. Data-driven dose calculation algorithm based on deep u-net. Phys Med Biol. 2020;65(24):245035. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/abca05.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ma J, Nguyen D, Bai T, Folkerts M, Jia X, Lu W, et al. A feasibility study on deep learning-based individualized 3d dose distribution prediction. Med Phys. 2021;48(8):4438–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.15025.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Jiang C, Ji T, Qiao Q. Application and progress of artificial intelligence in radiation therapy dose prediction. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2024;47:100792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100792.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Harb H, Villa M, Benoit D, Pham C-H, Nasr B, Bert J. Fast operating room scattered radiation calculation in x-ray guided interventions by using deep learning. J Radiol Prot. 2025;45(4):041524. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ae268e.

Article  Google Scholar 

Elhaie M, Koozari A, Shahbazi-Gahrouei D. Machine learning and neural network approaches for enhanced measuring and prediction of radiation doses. J Radiat Res Appl Sci. 2025;18(1):101252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2024.101252.

Article  Google Scholar 

Park K, Bae K, Kim Y, Seo WK. Development of a real-time active safety management platform and data collection device for the safety of radiation workers. J Radiat Ind. 2024;18(3):209–15.

Google Scholar 

Kim CH, Yeom Y, Petoussi-Henß N, Zankl M, Bolch WE, Lee C, et al. Icrp publication 145: adult mesh-type reference computational phantoms. Ann ICRP. 2020;49(3):13–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146645319893605.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Blender V 3.6: Blender—a 3D Modelling and Rendering Package. Blender Foundation, (2023). Blender Foundation. Version 3.6. https://www.blender.org

Kim S-C, Jung H-M. A study on performance of low-dose medical radiation shielding fiber (rsf) in ct scans. Int J Technol. 2013;4(2).

Harb H, Benoit D, Rannou A, Pham C-H, Tissot V, Nasr B, et al. Machine learning-based modeling of the anode heel effect in X-ray beam Monte Carlo simulations. Phys Med Biol. 2025;71(1):015007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ae2cdf.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bert J, Perez-Ponce H, Bitar ZE, Jan S, Boursier Y, Vintache D, et al. Geant4-based Monte Carlo simulations on GPU for medical applications. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58(16):5593–611. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/58/16/5593.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Krah N, Baudier T, Bert J, Chatzipapas K, Favaretto M, Fuchs H, et al. Gate 10 Monte Carlo particle transport simulation—part ii: architecture and innovations. Phys Med Biol. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ae237c.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sarrut D, Baudier T, Bert J, Chatzipapas K, Favaretto M, Fuchs H, et al. Gate 10 Monte Carlo particle transport simulation—part i: development and new features. Phys Med Biol. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ae237b.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. 2015;234–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28

Esser P, Sutter E, Ommer B. A variational u-net for conditional appearance and shape generation. Proc IEEE Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit. 2018:8857–66. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1804.04694

Chen J, Mei J, Li X, Lu Y, Yu Q, Wei Q, Luo X, Xie Y, Adeli E, Wang Y, et al. 3d transunet: Advancing medical image segmentation through vision transformers. arxiv 2023. 2023. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.07781

Xin M, Wen J, Wang Y, Yu W, Fang B, Hu J, et al. Blood vessel segmentation based on the 3d residual u-net. Int J Pattern Recognit Artif Intell. 2021;35(11):2157007. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021800142157007X.

Article  Google Scholar 

Low DA, Harms WB, Mutic S, Purdy JA. A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions. Med Phys. 1998;25(5):656–61. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.598248.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Van Dyk J, Barnett R, Cygler J, Shragge P. Commissioning and quality assurance of treatment planning computers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993;26(2):261–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(93)90206-B.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Park JM, Kim J-I, Park S-Y, Oh DH, Kim S-T. Reliability of the gamma index analysis as a verification method of volumetric modulated arc therapy plans. Radiat Oncol. 2018;13(1):175. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1123-x.

Article  CAS