Caldecott, K. W. Causes and consequences of DNA single-strand breaks. Trends Biochem. Sci. 49, 68–78 (2024).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lindahl, T. & Barnes, D. E. Repair of endogenous DNA damage. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 65, 127–133 (2000).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nielsen, I. et al. A Flp-nick system to study repair of a single protein-bound nick in vivo. Nat. Methods 6, 753–757 (2009).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Strumberg, D. et al. Conversion of topoisomerase I cleavage complexes on the leading strand of ribosomal DNA into 5′-phosphorylated DNA double-strand breaks by replication runoff. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 3977–3987 (2000).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mayle, R. et al. Mus81 and converging forks limit the mutagenicity of replication fork breakage. Science 349, 742–747 (2015).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Vrtis, K. B. et al. Single-strand DNA breaks cause replisome disassembly. Mol. Cell 81, 1309–1318 (2021).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kuzminov, A. Single-strand interruptions in replicating chromosomes cause double-strand breaks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 8241–8246 (2001).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cortés-Ledesma, F. & Aguilera, A. Double-strand breaks arising by replication through a nick are repaired by cohesin-dependent sister-chromatid exchange. EMBO Rep. 7, 919–926 (2006).

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Vilenchik, M. M. & Knudson, A. G. Endogenous DNA double-strand breaks: production, fidelity of repair, and induction of cancer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 12871–12876 (2003).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bhowmick, R. et al. RAD51 protects human cells from transcription-replication conflicts. Mol. Cell 82, 3366–3381 (2022).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Henckaerts, E. et al. Site-specific integration of adeno-associated virus involves partial duplication of the target locus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 7571–7576 (2009).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ortega, P. et al. Mechanism of DNA replication fork breakage and PARP1 hyperactivation during replication catastrophe. Sci. Adv. 11, eadu0437 (2025).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hanzlikova, H. et al. The importance of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase as a sensor of unligated Okazaki fragments during DNA replication. Mol. Cell 71, 319–331 (2018).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Fugger, K. et al. Targeting the nucleotide salvage factor DNPH1 sensitizes BRCA-deficient cells to PARP inhibitors. Science 372, 156–165 (2021).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Serrano-Benitez, A. et al. Unrepaired base excision repair intermediates in template DNA strands trigger replication fork collapse and PARP inhibitor sensitivity. EMBO J. 42, e113190 (2023).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Huang, M. E. et al. C-to-G editing generates double-strand breaks causing deletion, transversion and translocation. Nat. Cell Biol. 26, 294–304 (2024).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Feng, Y. L. et al. DNA nicks induce mutational signatures associated with BRCA1 deficiency. Nat. Commun. 13, 4285 (2022).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

da Costa, A., Chowdhury, D., Shapiro, G. I., D’Andrea, A. D. & Konstantinopoulos, P. A. Targeting replication stress in cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 22, 38–58 (2023).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Farmer, H. et al. Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy. Nature 434, 917–921 (2005).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Simoneau, A., Xiong, R. & Zou, L. The trans cell cycle effects of PARP inhibitors underlie their selectivity toward BRCA1/2-deficient cells. Genes Dev. 35, 1271–1289 (2021).

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kimble, M. T. et al. Repair of replication-dependent double-strand breaks differs between the leading and lagging strands. Mol. Cell 85, 61–77 (2025).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pavani, R. et al. Structure and repair of replication-coupled DNA breaks. Science 385, eado3867 (2024).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Elango, R. et al. Two-ended recombination at a Flp-nickase-broken replication fork. Mol. Cell 85, 78–90 (2025).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vriend, L. E. M. et al. Distinct genetic control of homologous recombination repair of Cas9-induced double-strand breaks, nicks and paired nicks. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 5204–5217 (2016).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cortés-Ledesma, F., Tous, C. & Aguilera, A. Different genetic requirements for repair of replication-born double-strand breaks by sister-chromatid recombination and break-induced replication. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 6560–6570 (2007).

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hashimoto, Y., Puddu, F. & Costanzo, V. RAD51- and MRE11-dependent reassembly of uncoupled CMG helicase complex at collapsed replication forks. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 17–24 (2011).

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Xu, Y. et al. DNA nicks in both leading and lagging strand templates can trigger break-induced replication. Mol. Cell 85, 91–106 (2025).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Li, S. et al. PIF1 helicase promotes break-induced replication in mammalian cells. EMBO J. 40, e104509 (2021).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lee, R. S., Twarowski, J. M. & Malkova, A. Stressed? Break-induced replication comes to the rescue! DNA Repair 142, 103759 (2024).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bosco, G. & Haber, J. E. Chromosome break-induced DNA replication leads to nonreciprocal translocations and telomere capture. Genetics 150, 1037–1047 (1998).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central