Emiliani E, Kanashiro A, Angerri O (2023) Lasers for stone lithotripsy: advantages/disadvantages of each laser source. Curr Opin Urol 33(4):302–307. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000001092

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Abushamma F, Zyoud SH (2024) Analyzing global research trends and focal points in the utilization of laser techniques for the treatment of urolithiasis from 1978 to 2022: visualization and bibliometric analysis. Urolithiasis 52(1):67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-024-01568-1

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ramos HLCJ, Fakih N (2020) Laser Lithotripsy Fundamentals: From the Physics to Optimal Fragmentation. Open Access J Urol Nephrol 6(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.23880/oajun-16000187

Article  Google Scholar 

Traxer O, Keller EX (2020) Thulium fiber laser: the new player for kidney stone treatment? A comparison with Holmium:YAG laser. World J Urol 38(8):1883–1894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02654-5

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Traxer O, Sierra A, Corrales M (2022) Which Is the Best Laser for Lithotripsy? Thulium Fiber Laser. Eur Urol Open Sci 44:15–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2022.05.020

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kallidonis P, Vagionis A (2022) The future of laser technology in kidney stones. Curr Opin Urol 32(4):411–414. https://doi.org/10.1097/mou.0000000000001006

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kronenberg P, Traxer O (2019) The laser of the future: reality and expectations about the new thulium fiber laser-a systematic review. Transl Androl Urol 8(Suppl 4):S398–S417. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2019.08.01

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Taratkin M, Laukhtina E, Singla N et al (2021) How Lasers Ablate Stones: In Vitro Study of Laser Lithotripsy (Ho:YAG and Tm-Fiber Lasers) in Different Environments. J Endourol 35(6):931–936. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2019.0441

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhao X, Ma W, Chen J, Xiang G, Zhong P, Wang K (2024) Vapour bubbles produced by long-pulsed laser: a race between advection and phase transition. J Fluid Mech 999. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2024.989

Denstedt J, Gabrigna Berto FC (2023) Thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: Is it living up to the hype? Asian J Urol 10(3):289–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2022.11.003

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sierra A, Corrales M, Pinero A, Traxer O (2022) Thulium fiber laser pre-settings during ureterorenoscopy: Twitter’s experts’ recommendations. World J Urol 40(6):1529–1535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-03966-9

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sierra A, Panthier F, Castillo E et al (2024) Assessment of Holmium:YAG, Pulsed-Thulium:YAG and Thulium Fiber Lasers for Urinary Stone Ablation. Vitro Study J Endourol 38(11):1209–1216. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0349

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yang B, Ray A, Zhang JJ, Peng S, O’Brien M, Turney B (2023) Stone ablation efficacy: a comparison of a thulium fibre laser and two pulse-modulated holmium:YAG lasers. Urolithiasis 51(1):31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-022-01393-4

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chen J, Mishra A, Medairos R et al (2023) In vitro investigation of stone ablation efficiency, char formation, spark generation, and damage mechanism produced by thulium fiber laser. Urolithiasis 51(1):124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-023-01501-y

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Basulto-Martinez M, Proietti S, Pavia MP, Yeow Y, Eisner BH, Giusti G (2023) Understanding the ablation rate of Holmium:YAG and thulium fiber lasers. Perspectives from an in vitro study. Urolithiasis 51(1):32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-022-01402-6

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Liu M, Peng Y, Wang Z et al (2021) Ablation Efficiency of a Novel Thulium Fiber Laser: An In Vitro Study on Laser Setting and Fiber Usage. J Endourol 35(8):1211–1216. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.1116

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hardy LA, Vinnichenko V, Fried NM (2019) High power holmium:YAG versus thulium fiber laser treatment of kidney stones in dusting mode: ablation rate and fragment size studies. Lasers Surg Med 51(6):522–530. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23057

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

VentimigliaE,Doizi S, Kovalenko A, Andreeva V, Traxer O (2020) Effect of temporal pulse shape on urinary stone phantom retropulsion rate and ablation efficiency using holmium:YAG and super-pulse thulium fibre lasers. BJU Int 126(1):159–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15079

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Petzold R, Miernik A, Suarez-Ibarrola R (2021) Retropulsion force in laser lithotripsy-an in vitro study comparing a Holmium device to a novel pulsed solid-state Thulium laser. World J Urol 39(9):3651–3656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03668-8

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kamal W, Kallidonis P, Koukiou G et al (2016) Stone Retropulsion with Ho: YAG and Tm: YAG Lasers: A Clinical Practice-Oriented Experimental Study. J Endourol 30(11):1145–1149. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0212

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Belle JD, Chen R, Srikureja N, Amasyali AS, Keheila M, Baldwin DD (2022) Does the Novel Thulium Fiber Laser Have a Higher Risk of Urothelial Thermal Injury than the Conventional Holmium Laser in an In Vitro Study? J Endourol 36(9):1249–1254. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2021.0842

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wanderling C, Saxton A, Phan D et al (2024) Getting hot in here! Comparison of Holmium vs. thulium laser in an anatomic hydrogel kidney model. Urolithiasis 52(1):49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-024-01541-y

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Peng Y, Liu M, Ming S et al (2020) Safety of a Novel Thulium Fiber Laser for Lithotripsy: An In Vitro Study on the Thermal Effect and Its Impact Factor. J Endourol 34(1):88–92. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2019.0426

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zha R, Wang D, Wang C et al (2025) Evaluating safe irrigation rates for Tm fiber laser lithotripsy to prevent thermal injury: an in vitro and numerical simulation. World J Urol 43(1):221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05614-4

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sierra A, Solano C, Corrales M et al (2024) Steady-state versus burst lasing techniques for thulium fiber laser. World J Urol 42(1):487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05102-1

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mishra A, Medairos R, Chen J et al (2024) Exploring optimal settings for safe and effective thulium fibre laser lithotripsy in a kidney model. BJU Int 133(2):223–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16218

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Li Z, Wu S, Liu T, Li S, Wang X (2024) Optimal parameter settings of thulium fiber laser for ureteral stone lithotripsy: a comparative study in two different testing environments. Urolithiasis 52(1):78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-024-01585-0

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Blackmon RL, Irby PB, Fried NM (2011) Comparison of holmium:YAG and thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: ablation thresholds, ablation rates, and retropulsion effects. J Biomed Opt 16(7):071403. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3564884

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Marom R, Glienke L, Robinson JW, Hall TL, Roberts WW, Ghani KR (2025) Characterizing stone ablation with the thulium fiber laser: a single-pulse comparison of different pulse durations. Urolithiasis 53(1):42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-025-01714-3

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Aldoukhi AH, Roberts WW, Hall TL, Ghani KR (2019) Watch Your Distance: The Role of Laser Fiber Working Distance on Fragmentation When Altering Pulse Width or Modulation. J Endourol 33(2):120–126. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0572